Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1146Hits:19524040Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
POLITICAL MOTIVATIONS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   130998


Exploring the final frontier: an empirical analysis of global civil space proliferation / Early, Bryan R   Journal Article
Early, Bryan R Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract While space capabilities were once concentrated among a handful of leading powers, an increasingly large number of states have gained access to them. As of 2007, 58 countries possessed dedicated civil space programs, 44 countries had placed nationally owned satellites into orbit, and 9 countries had achieved domestic space launch capabilities. To date, however, no systematic inquiries have ever been conducted into which countries acquire space capabilities and why. Within this paper, I develop an explanatory account that explores the capacity-based factors and political motivations that influence countries' acquisition of space capabilities. I test my hypotheses via a quantitative analysis of the factors affecting 143 countries' acquisition of civil space programs, satellite capabilities, and space launch capabilities from 1950 to 2002. My findings shed new light on the primary causes of the proliferation of civil space capabilities and yield a number of important policy implications
        Export Export
2
ID:   131643


Weak enforcement of intellectual property rights in China: integrating political, cultural and structural explanations / Lejeune, Johannes   Journal Article
Lejeune, Johannes Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract The discrepancy between de jure and de facto protection of intellectual property rights in China remains a heatedly debated topic. Unfortunately, political motivations have distorted the debate from its very beginning, which has not only resulted in a tendency for the different explanations to be played off against each other, but has also reinforced their specific flaws and biases. This study addresses these problems by advancing and integrating the three main explanatory frameworks for explaining the situation. The resulting integrated framework finds that structural factors such as bureaucratic fragmentation and political decentralization matter most in practical terms, but their durability cannot be understood without putting them into context. The findings also suggest that, contrary to most predictions, the future development of intellectual property protection in China might not follow the path laid down by other countries that have modernized in the past.
        Export Export