Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:673Hits:20530841Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
TANAKA, YOSHIFUMI (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   131371


Note on the M/V Louisa case / Tanaka, Yoshifumi   Journal Article
Tanaka, Yoshifumi Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract In the M/V "Louisa" case of 28 May 2013, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea held that it had no jurisdiction, even though it had established prima facie jurisdiction at the provisional measures stage. The M/V "Louisa" case thus gives rise to questions regarding the relationship between prima facie jurisdiction and jurisdiction on the merits. Moreover, the M/V "Louisa" Judgment also sheds some light on the applicability of the doctrine of abuse of rights provided in Article 300 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
        Export Export
2
ID:   156868


Reflection on the interpretaion and application of the article 121(3) in the south china sea arbitration (merits) / Tanaka, Yoshifumi   Journal Article
Tanaka, Yoshifumi Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Key Words South China Sea  Islands  SCS  Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal  Article 121(3)  Rocks 
        Export Export
3
ID:   142288


Unilateral exploration and exploitation of natural resources in disputed areas: a note on the Ghana/côte d'ivoire order of 25 april 2015 before the special chamber of itlos / Tanaka, Yoshifumi   Article
Tanaka, Yoshifumi Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Unilateral exploration and exploitation of natural resources in disputed marine areas create a sensitive issue in the context of maritime delimitations. In the Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire dispute concerning maritime delimitation, Côte d'Ivoire requested that the Special Chamber of International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) prescribe provisional measures to suspend all ongoing oil exploration and exploitation operations conducted by Ghana in the disputed area and to refrain from granting any new permit for oil exploration and exploitation there. In the Order of 2 April 2015, the Special Chamber declined the Côte d'Ivoire's request to prescribe the suspension of operations but did order that Ghana ensure that no new drilling either by Ghana or under its control take place in the disputed area. The Ghana/Côte d'Ivoire Order sheds light on the legal consequence of unilateral exploration and exploitation of natural resources in disputed marine areas.
        Export Export