Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1483Hits:18389550Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CONFLICTS RESOLUTIONS (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   131763


Aden Pivot: British counter-insurgency after Aden / Dingli, Sophia; Kennedy, Caroline   Journal Article
Dingli, Sophia Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This article argues that the Aden Insurgency was a pivotal moment in the history of British counter-insurgency. We argue that it was in Aden where the newfound strength of human rights discourse, embodied in Amnesty International, and of anti-colonial sentiment, expressed by the UN General Assembly, forced the British government to pay attention to public perceptions of colonial brutality. Using archival sources, we foreground three episodes in the history of the insurgency to support our argument and to illustrate that the changes witnessed were not the result of 'learning' but of a fundamental shift in the international environment.
        Export Export
2
ID:   131594


China meets India in Nepal: a historical and future perspective / Rana, Madhukar SJB   Journal Article
Rana, Madhukar SJB Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2013.
Summary/Abstract This article attempts to conduct a comprehensive assessment of India and China's interests in Nepal in the wake of the drastic political Nepal since 2006. In this regard, the '6C- Frame of 1 as been employed in the context of Nepal, viz, 1) What are : interests of China and India?; it) What are their conflicting I) What are the areas of cooperation," (iv) What are the areas ' v) How do they diplomatically communicate their T vi) How do they diplomatically coordinate their interests cooperation and minimize con?ict?
        Export Export
3
ID:   131761


Learning lessons or unearthing truths: using evidence to inform mediation policy / Walton, Oliver   Journal Article
Walton, Oliver Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This article assesses the potential for evidence-informed policymaking in the field of mediation. It argues that one of the key barriers to evidence-informed policymaking in this area is the disjointed character of the existing literature and finds that methodological and theoretical tensions lie at the heart of policy debates around mediation. While differences in theoretical, epistemological and normative perspectives of the existing research have made it difficult for policymakers to draw clear conclusions from the available evidence, the article nevertheless identifies a degree of convergence around certain key themes such as the importance of legitimacy in determining conflict outcomes and the benefits of combining quantitative and qualitative methods. It concludes by highlighting the importance of policy experimentation, evaluation and building capacity for policy learning in mediation policymaking.
        Export Export