Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:504Hits:19960851Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GOLDMAN, OGEN S (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   148297


Democracy for the rescue—of dictators? the role of regime type in civil war interventions / Abulof, Uriel; Goldman, Ogen S   Journal Article
Abulof, Uriel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Intrastate conflicts, long eclipsing interstate conflicts, are often internationalized. This paper examines internationalized intrastate conflicts through the types of both the intervening and the embattled regimes. Do democracies, more or less than autocracies, support autocratic governments in their fights against rebels? This paper tests three hypotheses: (1) democracies support autocrats fighting rebels less than autocracies do. (2) Democracies support democratic governments fighting against rebels more than autocracies do. (3) The more democratic two states are, the higher the probability one would support the other’s fight against rebels. Covering all documented external support in intrastate wars (1975–2000), our findings support hypothesis one and two only partly and confirm hypothesis three. However, comparing the two major accounts of the Democratic Peace theory (DPT)—the normative and the structural—our findings corroborate only the former robustly. The paper thus helps enriching the insights of the DPT beyond interstate conflicts.
Key Words Intervention  Democracy  Democratic Peace  Autocracy  Support  Civil War 
        Export Export
2
ID:   131994


Revisiting China's non-interference policy towards intrastate w / Chaziza, Mordechai; Goldman, Ogen S   Journal Article
Chaziza, Mordechai Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This article evaluates, through statistical analysis, China's foreign policy of non-intervention, and answers the question of whether or not China has kept to its declared policy regarding intrastate wars relative to the other four powers that are permanent members of the UN Security Council. The evidence in this article suggests that the Chinese policy of non-interference was more a declaration than a policy. China significantly lower only from the United States and the USSR/Russia and differs solely in numbers of interventions, their extent, and diversity. Yet China is the only power that has not sent troops to interfere in intrastate wars. The country's share among the powers in supporting actors in intrastate wars is significantly less as time passes, although China exhibited no significantly different trends between the Cold War and the post-Cold War periods. It is, on the contrary, the United States and UK among the powers that have significantly increased their relative share of interference.
        Export Export