Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1720Hits:19361003Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
ECONOMIC TERRITORY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   132321


Controlling access to territory: economic interdependence, transnational terrorism, and visa policies / Avdan, Nazli   Journal Article
Avdan, Nazli Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Previous scholarship has largely failed to address the effect of economic interdependence on issue areas other than interstate conflict. This study seeks to redress this lacuna by focusing on states' visa policies and examining the impact of trade and capital interdependence in the context of transnational terrorism. The article argues that economic ties affect visa policies through a reconfiguration of preferences and the opportunity costs of economic loss and by tempering the impact of terrorism. To support this claim, the study conducts statistical analysis using directed dyad data on the visa policies of 207 states and independent political units. The article shows that the impact of economic interdependence is contingent on whether states are directly targeted in attacks of terrorism or face indirect threats from global terror. The study finds that economic incentives overwhelm security concerns when threats are indirect but have relatively limited influence, given threats against a state's own citizens or territory.
        Export Export
2
ID:   155761


Free trade agreements and “economic territory” as a geoeconomic imaginary in South Korea / Lee, Seung-Ook   Journal Article
Lee, Seung-Ook Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Since the early 2000s, the discourse of “economic territory” has surfaced in conjunction with economic neoliberalization in South Korea. This paper argues that economic territory as a geoeconomic imaginary not only facilitated the expansion of free trade agreements as an accumulation strategy but also served as a hegemonic project which masked the nature of an accumulation strategy as a class project and consolidated political legitimacy by manipulating nationalism. To examine this linkage, it critically draws upon the idea of cultural political economy (CPE) developed by Lancaster-based sociologists Bob Jessop and Ngai-Ling Sum. This paper offers a fresh and more substantial interpretation of South Korea’s political economy and opens up new analytical space for CPE.
        Export Export