Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1318Hits:19136714Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
AUTHORITARIAN LEGACIES (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   191965


Authoritarian Legacies and Partisan Bias in Corruption Voting / Kim-Leffingwell, Sanghoon   Journal Article
Kim-Leffingwell, Sanghoon Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract What explains the lack of electoral consequences for corrupt politicians? Building on studies of motivated reasoning and asymmetric partisan bias, this article highlights the importance of partisan differences in how voters interpret corruption convictions and make voting decisions. I contend that in post-authoritarian democracies, supporters of authoritarian legacy parties (ALPs) are less likely to punish corrupt copartisan incumbents compared to supporters of other parties faced with equally corrupt copartisan incumbents. While voters of all kinds appear likely to ignore corruption among copartisan incumbents, supporters of authoritarian legacy parties are particularly likely to do so. Using original datasets from South Korea, this study shows empirical evidence of the lack of corruption voting for ALP partisans across three legislative elections. This article further finds partisan discrepancies and a striking lack of corruption voting among authoritarian legacy partisans.
        Export Export
2
ID:   132892


Comparing intelligence democratization in Latin America: Argentina, Peru, and Ecuador Cases / Estevez, Eduardo E   Journal Article
Estevez, Eduardo E Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This article aims to contribute to the understanding of the intelligence democratization process in new democracies comparing three South American countries: Ecuador, Peru, and Argentina. With a background of authoritarian legacies ('political police' style intelligence agencies controlled by the military) under particular political circumstances and changing strategic environments, these countries experienced disparate trajectories, prescriptions, and outcomes in their efforts to reform their intelligence communities. Drawing on new institutionalism, historical moments and relevant events shaping the dynamics of intelligence democratization are highlighted for each case, depicting failures and successes, and identifying drivers of change.
        Export Export