Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1125Hits:19497624Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
OBAMA'S REGIME (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   133263


Framing kony: Uganda's war, Obama's advisers and the nature of 'influence' in western foreign policy making / Fisher, Jonathan   Journal Article
Fisher, Jonathan Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This article explores the influence of actors and organisations outside the corridors of power in Washington, DC on US 'crisis foreign policy making' in Africa. Focusing on the case of US policy towards the lra/northern Uganda crisis - particularly the Obama administration's 2011 decision to send 'combat-equipped US forces' to pursue the rebel group across central Africa - it is argued that the role of African governments themselves merits greater consideration. The decision to send in these 'military advisers' was arguably strongly influenced by campaigns run by Western policy institutes, notably the International Crisis Group, and US advocacy groups since around 2007. The Ugandan regime of Yoweri Museveni has - it is suggested - nevertheless itself fundamentally shaped the nature and direction of the debate into which such groups have entered. This raises crucial questions about the agency of African governments in Western 'crisis' decision-making fora.
        Export Export
2
ID:   133587


Obama's surge: a bureaucratic politics analysis of the decision to order a troop surge in the Afghanistan War / Marsh, Kevin   Journal Article
Marsh, Kevin Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract This study examines the decision-making process leading to President Barack Obama's decision to order a troop surge in Afghanistan in December 2009. I analyze the decision-making process according to the precepts of the bureaucratic politics model and conclude that the bureaucratic politics model provides a compelling and descriptively accurate account of the Afghanistan surge decision-making process. Actors' policy preferences were influenced by consideration of bureaucratic role and position within government, significant examples of political activity occurred throughout the strategy review, and the ultimate decision was a political compromise.
        Export Export