Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:477Hits:20418416Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GARCIA, JORGE H (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   133294


Development and deployment of low-carbon energy technologies: the role of economic interests and cultural worldviews on public support / Cherry, Todd L; Garcia, Jorge H; Kallbekken, Steffen; Torvanger, Asbjorn   Journal Article
Kallbekken, Steffen Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Large-scale deployment of low-carbon energy technologies is crucial to mitigating climate change, and public support is an important barrier to policies and projects that facilitate deployment. This paper provides insights to the origins of public opposition that can impede the adoption of low-carbon technologies by investigating how perceptions are shaped by local economic interests and individual cultural worldviews. The research considers both carbon capture and storage and wind energy technologies because they differ in maturity, economic impact and resource base. Further, for each technology, the research examines support for two types of policies: deployment in local community and public funding for research and development. Results indicate the influence of economic interests and cultural worldviews is policy specific. Individual cultural worldviews do not affect support for the deployment of technology, but they do significantly influence a person×s support for publicly funded research and development. Conversely, local economic interests have a significant role in determining support for deployment, while they do not affect support for research and development.
        Export Export
2
ID:   149941


Willingness to accept local wind energy development: does the compensation mechanism matter? / Garcia, Jorge H; Cherry, Todd L ; Kallbekken, Steffen ; Torvanger, Asbjørn   Journal Article
Kallbekken, Steffen Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Wind power development projects often include compensation for the affected communities, but little is known about the efficacy of the alternative compensation mechanisms. This study addresses this question by examining the relative potential of private and public compensation. We conduct a Choice Experiment (CE) that investigates household preferences of compensation for the local siting of a hypothetical wind park. Households chose among different alternatives, where each alternative was characterized by three varying attributes: the number of turbines, the level of private compensation, and the level of public compensation. Results indicate the wind park imposes welfare losses to local residents and non-local recreational users, with about 35% of these losses corresponding to non-use values. Findings show that households prefer public compensation to private compensation, with household’s willingness to accept being lower with public compensation than private compensation. This finding suggests that estimates of local resistance to wind development depends on the compensation mechanism.
        Export Export