Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1249Hits:19118927Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MARC SAGEMAN'S POLEMIC (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   133536


Comments on Marc Sageman's polemic "the Stagnation in terrorism / Schmid, Alex P   Journal Article
Schmid, Alex P Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Marc Sageman's lamenting about the "Stagnation in Terrorism Research" stands in stark contradiction to my conclusion in the Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research (2011) that "Terrorism Studies-despite many shortcomings-has matured" and that "Terrorism Studies has never been in better shape than now." 1 While I agree with much else of what Marc Sageman says, there are a few points I disagree with. To begin with the notion of "stagnation": Terrorism Studies began, with few exceptions (Crozier, 1960; Thornton, 1964; Walter, 1964, 1969; Gaucher, 1965), 2 in the 1970s. Yet there had never been a period of real bloom in the 20th century-something which logically should precede the alleged stagnation after 9/11. As Andrew Silke noted in 2006:
        Export Export