Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:809Hits:20001197Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
DOMESTIC POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   138312


Difficult to relinquish territory which had been conquered: expansionism and the war of 1812 / Maass, Richard W   Article
Maass, Richard W Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The myth that U.S. expansionism drove the War of 1812 has proven resilient. Histories attributing the war to a U.S. desire to absorb Canada continue to be published despite relative consensus among experts that the primary U.S. objective was the repeal of British maritime restrictions, and even experts often include caveats regarding possible expansionism underlying U.S. motives. This article finally lays this myth to rest. The Madison administration and Congress initiated the War of 1812 because six years of economic sanctions had failed to bring Britain to the negotiating table, and threatening the Royal Navy’s Canadian supply base was their last hope. Expansionism would have made sense given the precedent of the Revolution, British military preoccupation with Napoleon, and the material gains to be had by annexing Canada, but U.S. leaders feared the domestic political consequences of doing so. Notably, what limited expansionism there was focused on sparsely populated western lands rather than the more populous eastern settlements.
        Export Export
2
ID:   133629


Peacemaking and political survival in Sadat's Egypt / Wolf, Albert B   Journal Article
Wolf, Albert B Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract What are the domestic political consequences of peacemaking for dictators? The conventional wisdom suggests that nations are better off reaching settlements that allow them to avoid the costs of war.1 The effectiveness of cooperation with autocracies is of interest to policy makers and international-relations theorists alike. Debates over issues such as the First Step Agreement with Iran or U.S.-China policy have focused on the effectiveness of engagement (defined as attempts to influence the behaviors of a target state through positive inducements).2 States sometimes cooperate with their rivals, expecting that engagement will bolster the political fortunes of moderates in the target regime
        Export Export