Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:599Hits:19909388Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MILEWICZ, KAROLINA M (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   149132


Cooperation by treaty: the role of multilateral powers / Snidal, Duncan; Milewicz, Karolina M   Journal Article
Milewicz, Karolina M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Who supports multilateral treaties and who does not? We offer a systematic account of treaty ratification patterns paying particular attention to different states' roles in international legal cooperation in relation to the United States' ratification behavior. States' ability to influence the terms of treaties and their acceptance increases their incentives for treaty ratification. Multilateral powers—states that are powerful and independent from the United States—support multilateral legal cooperation because it offers them an opportunity to shape treaty content. Their engagement in multilateral treaties is strongest when the United States does not lead. States that are weak and/or dependent cannot greatly affect treaties and are therefore less supportive of them but are subject to US pressure. An empirical analysis of states' decisions to ratify prominent postwar multilateral treaties covering a wide range of global issues supports our argument.
        Export Export
2
ID:   133649


Hidden world of multilateralism: treaty commitments of newly democratized states in Europe / Milewicz, Karolina M; Elsig, Manfred   Journal Article
Elsig, Manfred Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2014.
Summary/Abstract Why do new EU democracies engage in multilateralism? The dominant explanation proposes that new democracies use international treaties to lock in domestic reforms. This article offers a novel explanation as to why new EU democracies participate in multilateral treaties. We argue that ratifying a treaty serves three external signaling purposes (recognition concerns, increasing strategic autonomy, and pleasing the European Union). We test our argument through a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods. First, we apply event history analysis. Drawing on a new ratification data set comprising 76 multilateral treaties, we illustrate the prominent role of new EU democracies in multilateralism as compared to other new democracies. Second, to assess the importance of external signaling in the decision to ratify multilateral treaties, we examine parliamentary ratification debates in selected Central and Eastern European countries. Third, we compare parliamentary discussions across European and non-European new democracies to demonstrate the different motives driving their approaches toward multilateralism.
        Export Export