| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
060745
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Winter 2004-05.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
111039
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
071518
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
051104
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
079722
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Since the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, and particularly since 9/11, the current path of European integration may mean the difference between a strong and secure Europe and the disintegration of a grand, idealistic experiment. This is especially true in light of a growing transatlantic divide, and the need for new security policies to combat terrorism. As Europe grapples with this security issue, will strongly held beliefs about sovereignty cede ground to an untested supranational order? This article provides evidence that this process is already occurring, in large part because of the influential role of transnational experts in security technology. In the context of Europe, the possibility of a kind of EU Homeland Security is at the core of its future security role in the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
104861
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
050528
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Jan-Feb 2004.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This article analyzes the state of aviation security, beginning with the characteristics of the air transportation system that complicate the achievement of a high level of security. It analyzes the situation that existed prior to 9/11 and then evaluates the changes that have occurred since. It concludes that no overall systematic program has yet been put in place to deal with the threats that terrorism poses to the various elements of aviation. It also argues that aviation security, indeed homeland security, requires incorporating antiterrorism into foreign policy and ongoing attempts to deal with the underlying factors that promote terrorism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
083015
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
075524
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
087675
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2009.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Patrick S. Roberts examines the basic functions of homeland security, including defense against terrorist, natural, and industrial disasters. He concludes that the prevailing understanding of homeland security in theory and in practice undervalues the role of "mitigation," or reducing the damage when disasters occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
021974
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
July 2002.
|
| Description |
6-10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
052622
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
065253
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
130380
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
023241
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Dec 2002.
|
| Description |
39-43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16 |
ID:
060509
|
|
|
| 17 |
ID:
131724
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The grounds of Kainuu Brigade in North Finland are home to one of the country's three readiness formations, along with Pori in the West and Karelia in the East. The north is also home to the North Finland Signals Battalion and is the epicentre of activities surrounding the Finnish Army's tactical command, control (C2), and communications systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
ID:
080680
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2007.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
An effective terrorism alert system in a federal government has one central task: to motivate actors to take costly protective measures. The United States' color-coded Homeland Security Advisory System (HSAS) failed in this mission. In federal systems, national leaders cannot compel protective actions by setting an alert level; they must convince constituent governments and private parties that the desired actions are worth the costs. Such beliefs can be generated either by sharing the information behind an alert or by developing enough confidence in the alert system that the government's word alone suffices. The HSAS did neither, largely because it was not designed to generate confidence. Rather, the system's creators assumed that the public would trust the national leadership and believe in the utility of the system's information. Over time, as the HSAS became increasingly perceived as politically manipulated, there was no built-in mechanism to recover confidence in the system. An alternative, trust-based terrorist alert system could solve this problem. Building on the notion of "procedural fairness" from the psychological and legal traditions, this system would retain the political advantages of the HSAS, facilitate greater compliance among the requisite actors, and ameliorate many of the strategic problems inherent in terror alert systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
ID:
105885
|
|
|
| 20 |
ID:
142967
|
|
|