| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
137582
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
022178
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
Summer 2002.
|
| Description |
57-72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
069841
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
055576
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
082220
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
151090
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
A popular anecdote tells of an Israeli traveler who, on arriving at a foreign port, responds to the questions on his visa form: “Sex — yes, please; Occupation — no, just tourism.” It is a joke, of course, and quite funny. But at its core it’s very unfunny, even tragic. Around the world, mention “Israel” and word-association instantly invokes “occupation.” But mention “occupation” in Israel, and almost no one knows what you’re talking about. It’s cognitive dissonance on a national scale. How can you end something that doesn’t exist?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
124364
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2011.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
It is claimed that settlements are a violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention Relative to the Protection of Civilians (1949). But both the text of that convention, and the post - World War II circumstances under which it was drafted, clearly indicate that it was never intended to refer to situations like Israel's settlements. According to the International Committee of the Red Cross, Article 49 relates to situations where populations are coerced into being transferred. There is nothing to link such circumstances to Israel's settlement policy. A special regime between Israel and the Palestinians is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid-that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The Palestinians cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|