Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
092465
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The use of force in international relations by the West is increasingly witnessing a greater reliance on Special Forces. This trend has profound implications for state action because Special Forces represent a very different kind of soldier and they possess the inherent ability to transgress traditional boundaries in peace and war. The development and participation of UK Special Forces in the Global War on Terror provides a microcosm of the positive and negative dimensions of using secret military units as the force of choice against insurgents and terrorists in Afghanistan, Iraq and indeed on the streets of London.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
076935
|
|
|
Publication |
2007.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Drawing on new sources, the authors argue that Abu Musab al Suri (real name Mustafa Setmariam Nasar), now in U.S. custody, is the principle architect of Al Qaeda's post-9/11 structure and strategy. His vision, which predated 9/11, of transforming Al Qaeda from a vulnerable hierarchical organization into a resilient decentralized movement, was largely the formula Al Qaeda adopted after the collapse of the Taliban. The authors show how Setmariam, whose ideas have been disseminated widely on the Internet and whose disciples have gravitated to leadership positions in the international jihad, has influenced Al Qaeda's post-9/11 strategy, targeting, and doctrine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
082922
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article deals with the anarchist and the partisan as forerunners of contemporary terrorism. It investigates their different relationship to the state, the anarchist trying to replace it and the partisan trying to conquer it and what that means in terms of resistance, critique, and position on the use of force. The article is both theoretical and historical, trying to place the anarchist and the partisan within their different time epochs and institutional settings. It ends by discussing if and how a third type of political violence, Islamist terrorism, can be interpreted within the analytical framework of legality/illegality and regularity/irregularity worked out in the article, that is, to what extent is current the Islamist terrorist a child of the anarchist and the partisan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
093392
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
100225
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
096559
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article reviews and synthesizes social science knowledge on the connections between popular support and terrorist/insurgent sustainment. After distinguishing between "sympathetic of" and "supporting," the author identifies support requirements of terrorists and insurgents, the range of sources of support, and motives for support. A scheme of relationships between factors contributing to strength of support is essayed. As a caveat to population-centered approaches to counterterrorism and counterinsurgency, the article concludes that support is not "one size fits all," and that certain factors, when present, are more amenable to policy influence than others. These conclusions suggest that it is imperative that practitioners of counterterrorism and counterinsurgency be mindful of the specifics of their case when seeking to undermine support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
084870
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
061796
|
|
|
Publication |
Santa Monica, Rand Corporation, 2005.
|
Description |
xi, 75p.
|
Standard Number |
083303761
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
049649 | 363.32/DAL 049649 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
141545
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
When the Obama administration looks at the Middle East [2], it does so through the lens of counterterrorism. A systematic emphasis on the subject has underscored not just the administration’s relentless pursuit of al Qaeda and its new focus on the self-proclaimed Islamic State [3] (or ISIS) but also a wider swath of its foreign policy, from its drone campaign in northwestern Pakistan to its maintenance of the detention facility in Guantánamo Bay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
082155
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
105320
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Writing immediately after September 11, 2001, the author reflects on how America's optimism was transformed to a "Bleak New World" and considers the significance of classifying the terrorists' deeds as an act of war.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
094830
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Several novels have attained popularity in the extreme right subculture, most notably, The Turner Diaries-a tale of race war that convulses America. Some observers have characterized these novels as blueprints for revolution and terrorist campaigns. The medium of fiction can be an effective vehicle for propagandizing to those persons who may not be amenable to non-fiction political treatises. This article reviews some of the more popular extremist novels. By doing so, it provides insight into the worldviews and aspirations of the contemporary extreme right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
105564
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
107035
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Saqi Books, 2010.
|
Description |
208p.
|
Standard Number |
9780863564802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
056196 | 363.3250953/TAW 056196 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
089107
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Despite failing to meet the economic targets during the fiscal year 2008-09, the Pakistan peoples Party-led coalition government presented the Federal Budget 2009-10 on June 13, with the twin objectives to stabilise (the economy) with a human face and induce growth with equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
133681
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The Azerbaijani, Armenian, and separatist authorities of Nagorno-Karabakh have given conflicting accounts of a ceasefire violation on the night of 31 July - 1 August that reportedly resulted in the largest number of fatalities in more than a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
107852
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
169916
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Historians of terrorism note that modern terrorists rely almost exclusively on two weapon types: the gun and the bomb. However, the comparative use of these weapons differs from one terrorist group to the next. We exploit this variation to examine how the tactical decisions of terrorists respond to both strategic aspirations and resource constraints. We argue that a group’s goals (a strategic consideration) and size (a resource constraint) provide a parsimonious explanation for weapon selection. Because firearms inherently expose the shooter to higher risk, are more precise, and must be used if a group aspires to maintain social order, they are unlikely to be used by groups with limited recruits in a campaign of violence. We test this theory using data on over 350 terrorist organizations. Our analysis shows that strategic considerations and resource constraints both impact tactical choices, although groups with the most expansive goals, those which transcend national borders, as well as militias, are two interesting exceptions to our theory. Our research has implications for the use of disaggregated tactical data and in furthering our understanding of the rationality of terrorism.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
102518
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
023599
|
|
|
Publication |
March 2003.
|
Description |
16-38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|