| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
169575
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Amid rising global development funds in recent years, developed countries remain the main players despite their declining share, while developing ones have emerged as impressive forces with profound influence in international development cooperation (IDC).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
163075
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The relevance acquired in recent years by South–South cooperation seems to be connected with deeper structural transformations occurring in the international system. However, the variety of cooperation models promoted by new providers in the South requires the identification of complementary factors to help explain current patterns. A set of socio-cognitive elements, related to each country’s perceptions, identities and interests, can yield greater understanding of the variety of South–South cooperation models. Such an approach is here applied to the cases of Chile, Venezuela and Brazil – three important providers from the South – in order to explore their different cooperation models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
137300
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
FOSTERING INTERNATIONAL development, official facilitation of development, assistance to developing countries - these are closely related notions each of which is already recognizable in Russia, being actively discussed within the expert community but not always understandable to our country's citizens. This is why I consider it important to promote a broad public discussion about the way these processes generally evolve in the present-day world and what they mean for Russia as a world power with global interests and its own agenda for international relations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
136055
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
International development cooperation is undergoing fundamental changes. New – or often re-emerging – actors have gained importance during the past two decades, and are increasingly challenging the traditional approach to development cooperation associated with the members of the Development Assistance Committee of the oecd. Their supposedly alternative paradigm, ‘South–South cooperation’ (ssc), has been recognised as an important cooperation modality, but faces contradictions that are not too different from those of its North–South counterpart. ssc providers are highly heterogeneous in terms of policies, institutional arrangements, and engagement with international forums and initiatives. This article contributes to current debates on ssc by mapping the diversity of its actors – based on illustrative case studies from the first and second ‘wave’ of providers – and by presenting and discussing some possible scenarios for the future of ssc within the international aid system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|