Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1531Hits:19695930Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
CONSENSUS DEMOCRACY (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   113137


Can't get no satisfaction with the Westminster model? Winners, / Bernauer, Julian; Vatter, Adrian   Journal Article
Vatter, Adrian Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2012.
Summary/Abstract Are citizens in consensus democracies with developed direct democratic institutions more satisfied with their political system than those in majoritarian democracies? In this article, individual-level data from the second wave of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems and an updated version of Lijphart's multivariate measure of consensus and majoritarian democracy covering 24 countries are used to investigate this question. The findings from logistic multilevel models indicate that consensual cabinet types and direct democratic institutions are associated with higher levels of citizens' satisfaction with democracy. Furthermore, consensus democracy in these institutions closes the gap in satisfaction with democracy between losers and winners of elections by both comforting losers and reducing the satisfaction of winners. Simultaneously, consensus democracy in terms of electoral rules, the executive-legislative power balance, interest groups and the party system reduces the satisfaction of election winners, but does not enhance that of losers.
        Export Export
2
ID:   175579


Kinder, Gentler, Safer? a Re-Examination of the Relationship between Consensus Democracy and Domestic Terrorism / Bogaards, Matthijs   Journal Article
Bogaards, Matthijs Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Can inclusive institutions tame the threat of domestic terrorism? In a series of recent publications, the political scientists Arend Lijphart and Matt Qvortrup claim that consensus democracies are not only kinder and gentler, but also safer: consensus democracies are less likely to experience deadly domestic terrorism and when they do, they suffer fewer fatalities than majoritarian democracies. This article reexamines the logic and the evidence. It argues that the underlying grievance theory of terrorism contains important gaps and that the statistical results are based on a problematic coding of cases and lack robustness. Lijphart and Qvortrup have opened up an important new line of inquiry, but their results do not withstand scrutiny.
        Export Export
3
ID:   022564


Majoritarian and consensus democracy, electoral systems, and democratic consolidation in Asia / Croissant aurel 2002  Article
Croissant Aurel Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Publication 2002.
Description 5-40
        Export Export