Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
075927
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Pentagon Press, 2007.
|
Description |
xiv, 500p.Hbk
|
Standard Number |
8182742536
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
052135 | 954.035/SHA 052135 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
025471
|
|
|
Publication |
Lahore, National documentation centre, 1983.
|
Description |
ii, 306p.hbk
|
Contents |
Vol. III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
024248 | 954.55/SAD 024248 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
033954
|
|
|
Publication |
Lohore, National documentation centre, 1983.
|
Description |
lxvii, 529p.: ill.hbk
|
Contents |
Vol. I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:1,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location | IssuedTo | DueOn |
024246 | 954.55/SAD 024246 | Main | Issued | General | | SF120 | 24-Mar-2024 |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
164049
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This paper examines the geographies of Partition through an analysis of the Punjab Boundary Commission hearings of July 1947. The paper asks: what happens when geographical expertise is transported from ‘the field’ to courtrooms and government offices? I argue that geography was transformed, and was managed and limited by the legal framework that judged evidence according to its own rules. Examining select records of the Punjab Boundary Commission, I argue that the courtroom created certain assumptions about the nature and role of evidence in boundary-making negotiations. Rather than applying evidence to create a workable boundary, evidence was put to work in often contradictory ways in order to lend competing political claims an air of geographical authority.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|