|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
156124
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
138637
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
During his China visit, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s unusual candour in speaking about the problems that hold back the India-China relationship is a refreshing change from the past discourse of emphasising only improved border management and acceptance that the border issue will take a long time to resolve and should not impede the rest of the relationship from moving forward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
022748
|
|
|
Publication |
Spring 2002.
|
Description |
24-35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
081493
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Framed in the Justice and Home Affairs external dimension (JHAE) literature that argues that the European Union's (EU) internal security has become an objective of European foreign policy, this article offers an analysis of the institutionalization of border management in the Mediterranean. Investigating the role of Frontex, the European border management agency, this article reveals that border management in the Mediterranean is a fragmented policy that presents internal and external challenges. First, at an internal level, border management remains a sensitive issue where the principles of burden sharing and solidarity between EU member states are difficult to operationalize. Second, at an external level, effective border management is dependent on cooperation with EU's neighbours, as the Spanish-Moroccan case demonstrates. Lastly, along with these internal and external challenges, border management raises some crucial issues about the opportunity of externalizing surveillance technologies to authoritarian regimes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
064994
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
131026
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Neighbouring states are most relevant in foreign policy' and Myanmar, indeed, has strategic, economic, cultural and religious signi?cance for India. Myanmar is not where only China and India 'meet'; it is also the intersection between South Asia and Southeast Asiaz. It is a gateway to South Asia and a land bridge to the Association for Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). It is an opportunity and also brings with it a certain amount of vulnerabilities as well. Myanmar has huge potential for meeting India's energy requirement and for markets for Indian consumer goods; in return, India can contribute immensely in the field of infrastructure development, communication, education, tourism industry, science and technology. India and Myanmar are historically linked to each other through religion, people-to-people contact and sharing ethnically identical populations on both sides of the borders. The porous land borders of India and Myanmar are a cause of concern for peace, stability and economic development. Inhospitable terrain and an underdeveloped border region provide an ideal platform for insurgents, non-state actors, drugs and weapons traffickers to operate and spread their network
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
073124
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
064448
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
182546
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
From 2011, due to war, conflict, and ensuing unrest, both in the Middle East and Africa, the European Union’s southern external borders were confronted with an influx of migrants and refugees. At its height, the influx became known as a migration (or refugee) crisis and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (FRONTEX) was perceived as a pivotal partner in crisis management at the borders. FRONTEX does not avail of its own operators nor materiel, and, consequently, Schengen member states and Schengen Associated Countries were requested to contribute personnel and equipment for operations. From 2012 to 2018, this article analyzes the member states’ burden-sharing behavior regarding their contributions to European Border Guard Teams and Technical Equipment Pool. Our findings include both over- and under-contributors. As the sum total of contributions over all member states is high, it could be concluded, member states derive common benefits from border management. However, results also show that, as compared to others, member states situated at the European Union’s Southern and Eastern borders, on average, are over-contributing. Moreover, contributions from individual member states fluctuate over time. Apparently, the acquired benefits are not always perceived in the same way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
133502
|
|
|
Publication |
2014.
|
Summary/Abstract |
At a time when incidents at the Indo-Pakistan border make it to the headlines every day, there is hardly any reportage on the other important border, the Indo-Bangladesh border. The recent director general level talks between Border Security Force (BSF) and Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) was one such event which didn't find much mention in the newspapers. The Delhi edition of this biannual event saw the participation of delegations from both sides and issues related to effective border management were discussed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
155629
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Borders, both maritime and land, offer opportunities with regard to trade and cross-border movement of people and, at the same time, pose several challenges to a nation. The challenges include but are not limited to cross-border terrorism, illegal migration, trafficking and smuggling of arms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
115045
|
|
|
Publication |
2012.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Border-management policies are designed to balance national interests of border control with the costs of monitored cross-border interaction. These policies, formulated by national authorities, are often based on constructed definitions and interests of national security rather than wider understandings of the components of human security. This is especially evident in post-conflict borders where local initiatives of economic, social and environmental cross-border interaction are posed to contribute to regional stability and security. This article analyzes civilian cross-border cooperation in the southern section of the Israel-Jordan border region, distinguishing between local and national perspectives regarding border management. Focusing mainly on Israel's policies the article demonstrates how despite the vision of good neighbourly relations and their potential contribution towards regional prosperity and stability, local cross-border initiatives have been inhibited in the name of national security. The case study demonstrates the mechanisms and ramifications of exclusive securitisation policies of post-conflict border management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
190125
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Adroit Publishers, 2022.
|
Description |
xix, 281p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9788187393788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:1,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location | IssuedTo | DueOn |
060349 | 355.3/SOO 060349 | Main | Issued | General | | RF331 | 23-Mar-2024 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
073126
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
065253
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
073122
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
075247
|
|
|
Publication |
2006.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Oleksander Sushko turns more generally to the EU's policies towards the neighbouring east. The focus of Sushko's analysis is on border management. The author analyses the impact and effectiveness of EU initiatives towards the east on border management goals, as elaborated in the ENP. These goals seek to foster an open and cooperative eastern border, while concomitantly ensuing its security, transparency and control. In relation to the border management question, Sushko analyses three new EU policy initiatives in the region: the EU's upgraded role in the Transnistrian conflict, the EU Border Assistance Mission to Ukraine and Moldova and the EU's role in the new Moldova-Ukraine customs regime. The author concludes that these new initiatives prove that only through intense and multifaceted involvement can the EU realistically aspire to engendering constructive domestic and regional change, which could in turn contribute to the fulfilment of the EU's border objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
178027
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The 1998 Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement that cemented the peace process formalized Northern Ireland’s position as a region integrally connected to both Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland. The multilevel governance and cross-border cooperation this entailed was enabled by common UK and Irish membership of the European Union. The UK’s decision to leave the EU posed risks to this settlement. In response, they engaged in a quest for ‘flexible and imaginative solutions’ to this conundrum. The unique arrangements established through the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland in the UK–EU Withdrawal Agreement (2019) mark an innovative and ambitious development for the EU. First, it de facto includes a region of a non-member state within its internal market for goods and, second, it delegates the enforcement of its rules to that non-member state. The Protocol represents a significant departure for the EU in terms of its typical engagement with external actors. Most significantly, it will not only represent a ‘live’ concern for the EU but a unique type of responsibility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
161040
|
|
|
Publication |
Gurgaon, Penguin Random House India Pvt Ltd, 2018.
|
Description |
xxxiii, 410p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9780670090686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059501 | 355.033054/GUP 059501 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
065248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|