Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:542
Hits:20643409
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
ANNEX VII
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
137765
Intervention in an arbitral proceeding under annex VII to the UNCLOS?
/ Yee, Sienho
Yee, Sienho
Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Intervention in an international proceeding is only permissible with the consent of the parties to a case, expressed either as a general consent for a certain category of matters or as a specific consent for a particular case or a particular request for intervention. Treaty practice demonstrates this point. The UNCLOS, including Annex VII, does not contain such consent (more in terms of general consent if at all) to intervention in an Annex VII arbitral proceeding, although intervention is possible by separate consent if given by the parties in an act additional to the UNCLOS. Article 5 of Annex VII authorizing rule-making does not extend so far as to allow an Annex VII arbitral tribunal to make, without the consent of the parties, a rule that would permit intervention. Nor does such a tribunal have any inherent power or jurisdiction—independent of the consent of the parties in a case—that would allow it to permit intervention without the consent of the parties. Any innovation in this area will bring great harm to the institution of international arbitration under the UNCLOS and generally.
Key Words
Unclos
;
Arbitral Proceeding
;
Annex VII
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
167524
Russia’s Annexation of Crimea and the Passage of Ships Through Kerch Strait: a law of the sea perspective
/ Schatz, Valentin J; Koval, Dmytro
Schatz, Valentin J
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
This article discusses potential Ukrainian rights of passage through Kerch Strait against the background of restrictions on passage imposed by Russia since the annexation of Crimea, taking into account the ongoing arbitral proceedings under Annex VII of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. The article addresses first the question of the status of Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov under the international law of the sea. In a second step, the article deals with the issue of potential Ukrainian passage rights through Kerch Strait based on the legal status discussed in the first section as well as relevant bilateral treaties between Ukraine and Russia.
Key Words
Black Sea
;
Navigation
;
Crimea
;
Internal Waters
;
Annex VII
;
Kerch Strait
;
Sea of Azov
;
Historic Bays
;
Transit Passage
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export