Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:415Hits:20761528Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
SOKOLSKY, JOEL J (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   138284


NORAD does not need saving / Jockel, Joseph T; Sokolsky, Joel J   Article
Jockel, Joseph T Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In the current Canadian discussion of missile defence, it is often claimed that the future of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) is under threat and that it will be saved only if Canada opts in. The command does not need saving, however. Any such claim draws attention away from the real North American defence challenges that Canadians need to face in a debate about continental strategic defence: whether or not Canada needs to be protected by a missile defence system (a point that a Senate committee strongly emphasized in 2014) and what Ottawa needs to do about its own air defences that fall under NORAD.
Key Words Missile Defence  Air Defence  Canada  NORAD  Continental Defence 
        Export Export