Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:384Hits:19930428Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
U.S. POLICYMAKERS (5) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   170879


How to fix American health care: what other countries can—and can’t—teach the United States / Hsiao, William C   Journal Article
Hsiao, William C Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
        Export Export
2
ID:   142803


Is China pursuing counter-intervention? / Heath, Timothy; Erickson, Andrew S   Article
Erickson, Andrew S Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The term “counter-invention” has become burdened with conflated meanings and thus controversial in describing aspects of Chinese national and military strategy. Yet, the term should be retained although refined in two ways to help U.S. policymakers and planners devise appropriate responses to Chinese behavior aimed at undermining U.S. leadership in Asia.
        Export Export
3
ID:   139341


Problem from heaven: why the United States should back Islam’s reformation / Ali, Ayaan Hirsi   Article
Ali, Ayaan Hirsi Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract We have a problem—not a problem from hell, but one that claims to come from heaven. That problem is sometimes called radical, or fundamentalist, Islam, and the self-styled Islamic State is just its latest iteration. But no one really understands it. In the summer of 2014, Major General Michael Nagata, the commander of U.S. special operations forces in the Middle East, admitted as much when talking about the Islamic State, or ISIS. “We do not understand the movement,” he said. “And until we do, we are not going to defeat it.” Although Nagata’s words are striking for their candor, there is nothing new about the state of affairs they describe. For years, U.S. policymakers have failed to grasp the nature of the threat posed by militant Islam and have almost entirely failed to mount an effective counteroffensive against it on the battlefield that matters most: the battlefield of ideas.
        Export Export
4
ID:   152909


Slice of their sovereignty: negotiating the U.S. empire of bases, wheelus field, Libya, 1950-1954 / Heefner, Gretchen   Journal Article
Heefner, Gretchen Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Using the case study of Libya, this article examines how U.S. policymakers sought to rationalize their appropriation of sovereign territory for strategic needs in the 1940s. This article also demonstrates how scholars can use the often-overlooked infrastructure of the U.S. military to historicize the bottom-up construction of U.S. global power.
        Export Export
5
ID:   142696


Time to get tough on Tehran: Iran policy after the deal / Cohen, Eliot A; Edelman, Eric S; Takeyh, Ray   Article
Takeyh, Ray Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The nuclear deal that the United States and five other great powers signed with Iran in July 2015 [1] is the final product of a decadelong effort at arms control. That effort included sanctions in an attempt to impede Iran’s quest for a nuclear weapons capability. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action , or JCPOA, ranks as one of the most deficient arms control agreements in history. But U.S. President Barack Obama has pledged to spend the remainder of his tenure fending off congressional pressures to adjust its terms
Key Words United States  Saudi Arabia  Tehran  Iran Policy  U.S. Policymakers  JCPOA 
After the Deal 
        Export Export