| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
141317
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
141314
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
On July 14, Iran and the six-country group known as the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) reached an agreement on Iran’s nuclear program that promises to end the 13 years of escalating tensions that Tehran’s nuclear ambitions have caused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
141315
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Iran’s domestic politics and power structure have been a source of puzzlement and conjecture since the country’s 1979 revolution, which toppled a U.S. ally and brought the Islamic Republic to power. This bewilderment intensified during the nuclear negotiations between six world powers collectively known as the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) and Tehran.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
141316
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
As part of the ongoing discussion about the role of international law in the future of arms control and disarmament, this essay argues that negotiated agreements, rather than attempts to advance new rules of customary international law, offer critically important advantages in the area of disarmament.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|