Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1300Hits:19840954Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
FUND-RAISING (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   148253


Financial dereliction of duty : are charities that aid servicemen and veterans systematically mismanaged? / Webb, Natalie J; Abzug, Rikki   Journal Article
Natalie J. Webb, Rikki Abzug Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Charity watchdogs and the media level serious allegations of mismanagement of funds at charities serving former and current members of the U.S. armed services, affecting service recipients, families, donors, grantors, foundations, and taxpayers. To examine these allegations, we use two approaches from the literature to assess nonprofit financial effectiveness: the organization’s ability to gain resources and to sustain activities. We mirror the approach of charity raters, whose measures are widely available to the public. Using GuideStar/Internal Revenue Service data, we compare fund-raising expenditures, assets, and financial sustainability of large national military and veterans nonprofits to a random sample of national nonprofits. We apply propensity score matching and compare organizations similar in size, age, and other factors. We find little difference between military and veterans charities and other nonprofits and provide an improved method for evaluating the financial health of nonprofits across academic discipline, nonprofit field of service, and within or among countries.
Key Words Military organizations  Veterans  Fund-Raising  Nonprofits 
        Export Export
2
ID:   141708


Simultaneous and sequential contributions to step-level public goods: one versus two provision levels / Normann, Hans-Theo; Rau, Holger A   Article
Normann, Hans-Theo Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract In a step-level public-good experiment, we investigate how the order of moves (simultaneous vs. sequential) and the number of step levels (one vs. two) affects public-good provision in a two-player game. We find that the sequential order of moves significantly improves public-good provision and payoffs, even though second movers often punish first movers who give less than half of the threshold contribution. The additional second step level—which is not feasible in standard Nash equilibrium—leads to higher contributions but does not improve public-good provision and lowers payoffs. We calibrate the parameters of Fehr and Schmidt’s model of inequality aversion to make quantitative predictions. We find that actual behavior fits remarkably well with several predictions in a quantitative sense.
        Export Export