Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
170880
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
157419
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Believe me.” U.S. President Donald Trump has used that phrase countless times, whether he is talking about counterterrorism (“I know more about ISIS than the generals do. Believe me”), building a wall along the U.S.-Mexican border (“Believe me, one way or the other, we’re going to get that wall”), or the Iran nuclear deal (“Believe me. Oh, believe me. . . . It’s a bad deal”).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
166018
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyzes the way in which American politicians and experts debate the problem of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula, is analyzed from the viewpoint of how likely it is that a consensus can be reached in the domestic politics of the United States. The views of the most influential groups of the American establishment in the Democratic and Republican parties are examined in the context of current events in the region. The authors conclude that since these views largely coincide with the denuclearization policy of President Donald Trump, the administration and Congress will reach a full consensus on this issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
186795
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
178147
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
155659
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
170604
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
151339
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Donald Trump’s election as U.S. president threatens to upend the world’s most important bilateral relationship. On the campaign trail, Trump promised to label China a currency manipulator and to respond to its “theft of American trade secrets” and “unfair subsidy behavior” by levying a 45 percent tariff on Chinese exports [2]. As president-elect, he reversed four decades of U.S. policy when he spoke by telephone with Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen and declared [3] that the United States was not bound by the “one China” policy, the diplomatic understanding that has underpinned Washington’s approach to Beijing since 1979.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
152676
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
152677
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
THIS ARTICLE is a logical continuation of my previous essay, "Barack Obama: Preliminary Results of Presidency"1 that I ended with: "Obama has several months to go down to history not as the president of numerous conflicts and the state of international relations close to the Cold War but as the president who gave the world a slim hope of positive changes." Today, we can say that he has missed his chance to be remembered as a peacemaker and a realistically minded president who knew how to defuse international tension rather than fan it to worldwide dimensions. Indeed, he did all he could to leave behind a wasteland of American-Russian relations and not the slightest hope of positive changes any time soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
151792
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
155886
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
153480
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The Democrats who lost the 2016 elections and Donald Trump who beat them are much more alike in their talk and deeds than one might think. Both told their respective electorates that the U.S. had fallen victim to hostile foreign forces. Apparently, the problem is not that the Democrats have suffered a defeat, but that the U.S. has lost sight of the limits to what it can do in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
151949
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
151953
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
152590
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The global recovery from the Great Recession of 2009 has just entered its eighth year and shows few signs of fading. That should be cause for celebration. But this recovery has been an underwhelming one. Throughout this period, the global economy has grown at an average annual pace of just 2.5 percent—a record low when compared with economic rebounds that took place in the decades after World War II. Rather than rejoicing, then, many experts are now anxiously searching for a way to push the world economy out of its low-growth trap. Some economists and investors have placed their hopes on populists such as U.S. President Donald Trump, figuring that if they can make their countries’ economies grow quickly again, the rest of the world might follow along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
155661
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
163944
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Burden-sharing is not just the vogue du jour. It has been a longstanding U.S. desire and is much merited. Yet qualitative, beneficial burden-sharing requires leadership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
150983
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
An understanding of Donald Trump’s presidency must begin with his uniqueness in a domain that has been alluded to since his election, but little understood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
152577
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Media coverage of U.S. President Donald Trump’s foreign policy has been overwhelmingly negative. Analysts have seized on early policy missteps, a supposed slowness in staffing the national security bureaucracy, and controversial statements and actions as evidence that Trump’s foreign policy is already failing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|