Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:356
Hits:19887421
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
ISRAELI DIPLOMATS
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
146859
In Memoriam: Meir Rosenne (1931-2015)
/ Mazel, Zvi
Mazel, Zvi
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Contents
Meir Rosenne was one of the last representatives of a remarkable generation of Israeli diplomats who were born in Europe, survived the Holocaust and made the defense of the Jewish State their cause and purpose in life. The son of Jacob and Minna Rosenhaupt, Meir was born in 1931 in Jassy or Iasi, former capital of Moldavia and the capital of Rumania (1916-1918). Jassy was also the center of a thriving Jewish community. During World War II, a third of the community was killed in the worst pogrom of the war in Rumania.
Key Words
Israel
;
Black Sea
;
Jewish State
;
Israeli Diplomats
;
Meir Rosenne (1931-2015)
;
Rumania
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
141962
Not our salvation: Israel, the Genocide Convention, and the world court 1950–1951
/ Giladi, Rotem
Giladi, Rotem
Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
Jewish individuals and organisations played a cardinal role in making and promoting the 1948 Genocide Convention. The early attitude of the Jewish state—established a few months before the Convention’s conclusion—has not hitherto been explored. This analysis reconstructs Israel’s involvement in the 1951 advisory proceedings at the International Court of Justice concerning the Convention. Based on Ministry of Foreign Affairs archives and Court records, it demonstrates that contrary to what scholarship on subsequent episodes assumes or implies, Israel had no particular attachment to, nor was it vested in, the Convention. Rather, its attitude ranged from indifference and disinterest to scepticism and hostility. It allowed Israeli diplomats to utilise the Convention as a means to affect other neither urgent nor imperative foreign policy ends.
Key Words
Israe
;
Genocide Convention
;
World Court
;
1950–1951
;
Jewish Individuals
;
Israeli Diplomats
;
Foreign Policy Ends
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export