Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2639Hits:21007156Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GLOBAL ECONOMIC JUSTICE (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   142235


How activists use benchmarks: reformist and revolutionary benchmarks for global economic justice / Seabrooke, Leonard ; Wigan, Duncan   Article
Seabrooke, Leonard Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Non-governmental organisations use benchmarks as a form of symbolic violence to place political pressure on firms, states, and international organisations. The development of benchmarks requires three elements: (1) salience, that the community of concern is aware of the issue and views it as important; (2) will, that activists and issue entrepreneurs will carry the message forward; and (3) expertise, that benchmarks created can be defended as accurate representations of what is happening on the issue of concern. We contrast two types of benchmarking cycles where salience, will, and expertise are put to the test. The first is a reformist benchmarking cycle where organisations defer to experts to create a benchmark that conforms with the broader system of politico-economic norms. The second is a revolutionary benchmarking cycle driven by expert-activists that seek to contest strong vested interests and challenge established politico-economic norms. Differentiating these cycles provides insights into how activists work through organisations and with expert networks, as well as how campaigns on complex economic issues can be mounted and sustained.
        Export Export
2
ID:   144051


Liberal global justice and social science / Nili, Shmuel   Article
NILI, SHMUEL Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract My aim in this article is to ask how both the findings and the limitations of social science should inform the debate on global economic justice among liberal political philosophers. More specifically, I make three claims. First, I show that social science research casts doubt on key premises of important liberal global justice theories. However, second, I also suggest that empirical questions pivotal to these theories bring to the fore important limitations inherent to social science work on global issues. These limitations lead me to argue, third, that new normative concerns should feature in liberal discussions about global reform.
        Export Export