Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:366Hits:19961348Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
COUNTER-SECURITIZATION (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   142498


Securitization and counter-securitization in Afghanistan / Stritzel, Holger; Chang, Sean C   Article
Stritzel, Holger Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article confronts securitization theory with the war in Afghanistan and thus explores questions and dynamics of securitization in a specific communicative situation of military combat. The confrontation highlights not only less well researched questions of implementation, resistance, legitimacy and difficulties of establishing authority in securitizations, but it also inspires a conceptualization of counter-securitization within the theory. In Afghanistan sovereign power to control and realize a securitization at the implementation stage was significantly fragmented so that processes of securitization became more iterative and interactive, and acts of acceptance versus resistance with regard to securitizing moves were more complex than traditionally assumed by the theory. Reflecting on securitization theory, the article thus explores the case of Afghanistan through a conceptualization of its dynamics as a prolonged political game of moves and counter-moves marked by securitizing and counter-securitizing speech acts in which the communicative situation of war becomes visible as a process of strategic interactions in continuous sequences of action and reaction.
Key Words NATO  War  Afghanistan  Securitization  Copenhagen School  Counter-Securitization 
        Export Export
2
ID:   148394


Tibetan self-immolations as counter-securitization: towards an inter-unit theory of securitization / Topgyal, Tsering   Journal Article
Topgyal, Tsering Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article argues that the Tibetan self-immolations constitute a form of counter-securitization to China’s securitization of the 2008 Tibetan uprising. Theoretically, it argues that securitization theory (1) is too focused on the intra-unit interaction between securitizing elites and audiences, (2) leaves the inter-unit dynamics underdeveloped, and (3) fails to recognize the securitized “other” as an audience. This article theorizes the linkage between unit-level and inter-unit processes by exploiting three concepts: inter-discursivity, identity, and emergency measures. Contrary to existing theories, it shows that even unsuccessful securitizing moves can set off counter-securitizations thanks to audience overlap and inter-discursivity. The Sino-Tibetan interactions around the Tibetan self-immolations uphold these theoretical positions.
        Export Export