Search Result

Srl

Item

ID: 142738

Deliberative agenda setting: piloting reform of direct democracy in California / Fishkin, James; Kousser, Thad ; Luskin, Robert C; Siu, Alice

Kousser, Thad	Article
	0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)

Summary/Abstract

Can the people deliberate to set the agenda for direct democracy in large scale states? How might such an institution work? The 2011 California Deliberative Poll piloted a solution to this problem helping to produce proposals that went to the ballot and also to the legislature. The paper reports on how this pilot worked and what it suggests about a possible institution to solve the deliberative agenda setting problem. The legislative proposal passed the legislature but the ballot proposition (Prop 31) failed. However, we show that the proposals actually deliberated on by the people might well have passed if not encumbered by additional elements not deliberated on by the public that drew opposition. The paper ends with an outline of how the process of deliberative agenda setting for the initiative might work, vetting proposals once every two years that could get on the ballot for a greatly reduced cost in signature collections. Adding deliberation to the agenda setting process would allow for a thoughtful and informed public will formation to determine the agenda for direct democracy.

Key Words

California ; Direct Democracy ; Agenda Settin ; Piloting Reform

In Basket

Export

ID: 181572

Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room” / Fishkin, James

Fishkin, James	Journal Article
	0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)

Summary/Abstract

This paper is positioned at the intersection of two literatures: partisan polarization and deliberative democracy. It analyzes results from a national field experiment in which more than 500 registered voters were brought together from around the country to deliberate in depth over a long weekend on five major issues facing the country. A pre–post control group was also asked the same questions. The deliberators showed large, depolarizing changes in their policy attitudes and large decreases in affective polarization. The paper develops the rationale for hypotheses explaining these decreases and contrasts them with a literature that would have expected the opposite. The paper briefly concludes with a discussion of how elements of this “antidote” can be scaled.

In Basket

Export