Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1093Hits:19541004Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
DISCOURSE POWER (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   142867


Contextualising China’s call for discourse power in international politics / Hung-jen, Wang   Article
Hung-jen, Wang Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Scholars have been studying whether China’s call for “discourse power” in international politics (initially made in 2011) is simply a tactic in the country’s now-familiar pursuit of national interests as part of its ascendency. A closer look is required to avoid mistakenly considering it as no more than the Communist Party’s propaganda, which would miss the point regarding China’s use of the phrase in the context of prevailing normative worldviews regarding fairness and justice. The current Chinese international relations (IR) literature contains a significant number of articles on discourse power (huayuquan) that discuss how calls for protecting sovereignty and rights in international affairs represent a perceived cultural need on the part of the Chinese government to articulate its own worldview while promoting its national interests. The author argues that without identifying theoretical or conceptual rationales and processes that support China’s assertion of a need for discourse power in international affairs, it is possible to overlook the important cultural roots underlying the Chinese government’s repeated demands for legitimacy in its dealings with other nation-states.
        Export Export
2
ID:   179942


Japan-China Strategic Communications Dynamics under the Belt and Road Initiative : the case of "third country business cooperation" / Eto, Naoko   Journal Article
Eto, Naoko Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Since the 2000s, the power of international narratives has attracted much attention in China. Under the Xi Jinping administration, the enhancement of "international discourse power" became an explicit policy and a diplomatic goal, closely linked to its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). BRI, further, overlaps with China's efforts to develop a new concept of "institutional discourse power" as a mechanism to convert the economic gravity of China into political power by enhancing their agenda-setting capability, particularly in emerging rule-making process of the new economy. Such ambition has also shaped the new economic integrative framework between China and developed countries including Japan. Japan, on the other hand, relied on an increasingly inclusive notion of free and open Indo-Pacific (FOIP) to define and promote its relations with both "likeminded countries" and China for the purpose of making the BRI relative. Although Japan and China have agreed on economic cooperation in third countries as a new collaborative scheme in 2018, there remains a gap in their political objectives and strategic communications. This poses a major challenge for China, which hitherto has relied on China-centric narratives, as it can only enhance its identity as a global leading power by accommodating and accepting partially narratives of other major countries, including Indo-Pacific countries.
        Export Export