| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
145206
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
US relations with both China and Russia have become increasingly fraught. The broad outlines of a potential great-power clash between the United States and a rising China are growing more apparent each year. Against this backdrop, a series of maritime disputes between China and its neighbours, including US allies, threaten regional stability in Asia. US–Russian relations, meanwhile, have suffered greatly from the Ukraine crisis, plunging to their lowest level since the end of the Cold War. Under these circumstances, the possibility of an anti-Western, China–Russia alliance has re-emerged with new urgency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
149798
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
There have been noticeable attempts in recent International Relations scholarship to introduce the concept of ‘hedging’ as an alternative to ‘balancing’ and ‘bandwagoning’. This article argues that to be useful in the analysis of great power politics hedging should not be understood as an alternative to balancing or bandwagoning, but as a phenomenon of a different order. In contrast to balancing or bandwagoning, which describe great powers’ behaviour in response to system-level forces, hedging denotes interstate political matters unfolding at the unit and regional levels. The analysis of China–Russia relations supports this understanding. Both great powers are strategically on the same page with respect to resisting unipolarity and other global political issues, but their strategies often diverge with respect to purely bilateral relations, or policies in their salient geographic environments. This two-level nature of China–Russia relations—balancing the Unipole while hedging towards one another—suggests that their global strategic behaviour and regional bilateral interactions are subject to different causal forces that push in different directions. The former is a reaction to system-level pressure, whereas the latter is a result of multiple unit-level factors. Therefore, in the analysis of great power relations, hedging occupies a specific rung on the ladder of levels of analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|