Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1404Hits:19834724Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
COLORED REVOLUTIONS (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   145358


Complexities of Russia-Nato relations: grousing conflicts / Gidadhubli, R G   Article
Gidadhubli, R G Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract From what has been stated above, following concluding remarks are made. Initiatives and policy decisions of Russia to dissolve Warsaw Pact, ‘Constructive Cooperation’, Founding Act on Mutual Relations and Reset-Policy played an important role for promoting cooperation between Russia and NATO. But pursuance of policy of Eastward expansion of NATO on misplaced perceptions of threats from Russia, refusal to accept Putin’s proposal of ‘Equal Footing’ with NATO, problems arising out of Russia’s relations with Georgia and Baltic states, impact of ‘Colored Revolutions’, allegation of annexation of Crimea by Moscow, persisting differences on Crimean issue and accusation for east Ukrainian crisis, economic sanctions to punish and weaken Russia have been responsible for ongoing conflicts between Russia and NATO.
        Export Export
2
ID:   174728


Harnessing protest potential: Russian strategic culture and the colored revolutions / German, Tracey   Journal Article
German, Tracey Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The perceived threat posed to Russia from so-called colored revolutions–popular uprisings attributed by Moscow to malign sponsorship by external forces–has become a central theme in Russian security discourse. This article analyses how colored revolutions came to be characterized as a specific threat to national security and how they continue to shape Russian thinking about the changing character of conflict. It explores Russian perceptions of the threat from colored revolutions, using the concept of strategic culture as a framework to analyze these perceptions through an analysis of the Russian military theoretical literature and strategic documents. The article establishes that concerns about non-military means of destabilization reflect continuities in Russian strategic assumptions about adversaries and how they seek to achieve their national objectives. It also reveals the perpetuation of specific narratives about the country’s vulnerability to foreign interference.
        Export Export