Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:857Hits:19861729Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GERRYMANDERING (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   145647


Electoral manipulation in March 30, 2014 Turkish local elections / Aygül, Cenk   Journal Article
Aygül, Cenk Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article examines the effects of law no 6360 legislated by the Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi (AKP) before March 2014 local elections in Turkey. The law created 14 new metropolitan municipalities and greatly expanded 14 existing ones. It manipulated the elections first by adding all non-urban districts that were within the administrative borders, and second by dissolving all villages and towns by merging them with metropolitan municipalities. Analyzing the mayoral and councilor competitions, this article models how the elections would have ended had they been held within the pre-6360 borders, and concludes that election results were significantly altered because of distorted representation introduced by the law. Law no 6360 not only created advantages for AKP, but more importantly, it significantly weakened the main opponent Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi.
        Export Export
2
ID:   153293


When Is a gerrymander Not a gerrymander: who benefits and who loses from the changed rules for defining parliamentary constituencies? / Johnston, Ron; Pattie, Charles ; Rossiter, David   Journal Article
Pattie, Charles Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Members of the British Labour party have, not for the first time, criticised the Boundary Commissions’ proposals for new constituency boundaries as gerrymandering. This represents a misuse of the term: the Commissions have produced recommended constituencies in the context of new rules for such redistributions that give precedence to equality of electorates across all seats and the boundaries of those constituencies have been defined without any reference to the likely electoral consequences. The Conservatives, who were responsible for the change in the rules to emphasise electoral equality, wanted to remove a decades-long Labour advantage in the translation of votes into seats because of variations in constituency size, and the Commissions’ implementation of those rules has achieved that. A Labour advantage has been removed but not replaced by a Conservative advantage: in terms of electoral equality between the two, the playing field has been levelled. Labour's claim to have been disadvantaged by decisions on the electoral register is also examined; the disadvantage is probably only small.
Key Words Boundaries  Boundary  Constituency  Commission  Gerrymandering  Equal Electorates 
        Export Export