Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1144Hits:19484402Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search
  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
BANKES, NIGEL (4) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   156859


Compulsory and binding dispute resolution under the United Nations convention on the law of the sea: introduction / Jensen, Oystein; Bankes, Nigel   Journal Article
Jensen, Oystein Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
        Export Export
2
ID:   188218


Jurisdiction of the Dispute Settlement Bodies of the Law of the Sea Convention With Respect to Other Treaties / Bankes, Nigel   Journal Article
Bankes, Nigel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Part XV of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) establishes a system for compulsory and binding dispute resolution. Article 288(2) of UNCLOS allows the dispute resolution system of Part XV to be used by the parties to another international agreement in accordance with the terms of that other agreement, as long as that agreement is related to the purposes of UNCLOS. This article examines the treaty practice under Article 288(2) to assess how those other agreements (which are mostly regional fisheries management organization agreements) provide for access to Part XV. The article examines these agreements within the following analytical framework: (1) Are these agreements related to the purposes of UNCLOS? (2) What jurisdiction, ratione materiae, do the agreements confer on the court or tribunal? (3) How do the agreements provide for submission? (4) How do the agreements deal with applicable law issues? (5) How do the agreements deal with the availability of provisional measures?
        Export Export
3
ID:   156861


Precluding the applicability of section 2 of part XV of the law of the sea convention / Bankes, Nigel   Journal Article
Bankes, Nigel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
        Export Export
4
ID:   145651


Regime for transboundary hydrocarbon deposits in the maritime delimitation treaties and other related agreements of arctic coast / Bankes, Nigel   Journal Article
Bankes, Nigel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This article assesses the treaty practice of the five Arctic Ocean coastal states and Iceland in dealing with the issue of transboundary hydrocarbon deposits as part of the conclusion of maritime delimitation and other related agreements. That practice suggests a number of different ways in which states deal with the issue of hydrocarbon deposits bisected by a maritime delimitation: (1) silence, (2) a standard unity of deposit clause, (3) more complex variations on the standard clause including framework agreements for the development of transboundary deposits, and (4) a delimitation line with some form of joint development zone. This article assesses the Arctic state practice within this typology seeking to supplement the existing literature which tends to focus on the North Sea and Southeast Asia.
        Export Export