Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
145689
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
A popular narrative in India targets Bengali Muslims as “foreign encroachers” in Assam, claiming that they are in fact Bangladeshi migrants. An examination of the history of this narrative and an analysis of demographic data reveal that the available evidence does not support the illegal-infiltrator narrative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
145685
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The historical legacy of Japan-Myanmar relations provides an important rationale for the current economic cooperation. This underpins the perception that Japan is in a “special” position that allows it to seek its bounty—to reap the rewards from its investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
145683
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The politics of Japanese agricultural reform is rapidly changing. Once dependent on foreign pressure, reform is now fueled by a deepening farm crisis and a breakdown in postwar political alignments. Focusing on the Abe government’s reform of Japan Agricultural Cooperatives, we explore Japan’s expanding capacity for executive leadership in the farm sector on behalf of market-oriented change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
145686
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
There is the perception in Japan that a reforming Myanmar is Japan’s “final frontier” in Asia. Indeed, Japan is enthusiastically seeking a larger political and economic role there and appears confident about competing with China for influence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
145682
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Brunei and Malaysia are promoting the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration but enforce a brand of Islamic law that systematically violates it. The paradoxical ways in which policymakers are navigating between the two, and the empirical realities of Islamic governance, impede the project of a transdoctrinal justification of human rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
145687
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Both Russia’s 2012 APEC chairmanship and recent dynamics in its dialogue partnership with ASEAN indicate Russia’s intention and ability to act as a constructive player engaged in regional institutional activities in East Asia. However, the implementation of this intention faces both domestic and international limitations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
145688
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
Perspectives from Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Vietnam show that South Korea’s middle power role in Southeast Asia is confined to economics and capacity building. Despite being absent from Southeast Asia’s geostrategic calculus, Korea’s non-revisionist inclination is seen to be advantageous in its pursuit of enhanced middle power status.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
145684
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article addresses the identifiable conditions for hedging strategies. By examining specific cases of policy choices and political situations in a triangular framework, the author suggests that Taiwan’s hedging behavior against China is sensitive to local variation in power capabilities, economic intention, and the security commitment from the United States.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|