Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:455Hits:20437210Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
REPLY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   145971


On the conduct of sociological warfare: a reply to the special section on Economy of Force / Owens, Patricia   Journal Article
Owens, Patricia Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Economy of Force is not about the ‘economics of war’, or not in any straightforward sense. Rather, it retrieves the older, but surprisingly neglected, history and theory of oikonomia, the ancient Greek term for ‘household governance’. The book is a study of oikonomia in the use of military force, but also as underlying distinctly social forms of governance more broadly. There is a very long tradition of thinking about households-as-government and a great deal of scholarship in literary and gender studies on practices and ideologies of domesticity. Oikonomia is the origin of the language of modern ‘economics’, but more importantly and revealingly almost all writing about government in the West. International and much political theory is out of touch with these literatures, which has resulted in blindness to a crucial reality about modern governance forms. The large-scale household administration of life processes plays a remarkably central role in international and imperial relations.
Key Words Economy of Force  Sociological Warfare  Reply 
        Export Export
2
ID:   156199


Reply to “reducing political bias in political science estimates” / Maliniak, Daniel   Journal Article
Maliniak, Daniel Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Zigerell (this issue) cites the findings of his recent reanalysis (Zigerell 2015) of the data in our 2013 study of the gender citation gap in the international relations literature to support his claim that our study showed a “preference for statistically-significant results.” We thank Zigerell for so closely engaging with our work. However, we note that he is focused on how his changes to our sample affect a single model in our original paper, highlight the fact that we reported statistically insignificant results when they arose in our original analyses, and review the findings of other recent re-analyses of our data. Ultimately, while we disagree with Zigerell’s conclusions about our work, we join Zigerell in calling for greater diversity in the discipline.
Key Words Reply 
        Export Export