Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:787Hits:20730597Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
KEY, ELLEN M (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   146822


How are we doing? data access and replication in political science / Key, Ellen M   Journal Article
Key, Ellen M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Data access and research transparency (DA-RT) is a growing concern for the discipline. Technological advances have greatly reduced the cost of sharing data, enabling full replication archives consisting of data and code to be shared on individual websites, as well as journal archives and institutional data repositories. But how do we ensure that scholars take advantage of these resources to share their replication archives? Moreover, are the costs of research transparency borne by individuals or by journals? This article assesses the impact of journal replication policies on data availability and finds that articles published in journals with mandatory provision policies are 24 times more likely to have replication materials available than articles those with no requirements.
Key Words Political Science  Replication  Data Access 
        Export Export
2
ID:   168715


You Research Like a Girl: Gendered Research Agendas and Their Implications / Key, Ellen M   Journal Article
Key, Ellen M Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Political science, like many disciplines, has a “leaky-pipeline” problem. Women are more likely to leave the profession than men. Those who stay are promoted at lower rates. Recent work has pointed toward a likely culprit: women are less likely to submit work to journals. Why? One answer is that women do not believe their work will be published. This article asks whether women systematically study different topics than men and whether these topics may be less likely to appear in top political science journals. To answer this question, we analyzed the content of dissertation abstracts. We found evidence that some topics are indeed gendered. We also found differences in the representation of “women’s” and “men’s” topics in the pages of the top journals. This suggests that research agendas may indeed be gendered and that variation in research topic might be to blame for the submission gap.
        Export Export