Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1952Hits:19309289Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
IRB 2. (1) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   146824


Encountering your IRB 2.0: what political scientists need to know / Yanow, Dvora; Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine   Journal Article
Yanow, Dvora Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This essay corrects and updates one that was originally published in Qualitative & Multi-Method Research and, in a condensed version, in three other APSA Organized Section newsletters. Our research into IRB policy has shown that many political scientists are not familiar with some of its key provisions. The intent of the essay is to increase awareness of the existing policy’s impact on political scientific research and, in particular, on graduate students and junior faculty. We remain concerned that at present, faculty are leaving discussions of research ethics to IRBs (and their counterparts worldwide), whereas these Boards largely focus on complying with the regulatory details of governmental policy. Even though this essay seeks to clarify the latter, we remain convinced that research ethics ought to be vigorously taken up within disciplinary and departmental conversations.
Key Words Political Scientists  IRB 2. 
        Export Export