Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
131076
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
055926
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
032056
|
|
|
Edition |
rev 4th ed.
|
Publication |
London, Arms and Armour Press, 1987.
|
Description |
160p.Hbk
|
Standard Number |
0853688826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
029518 | 683.4/WAL 029518 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
096501
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
The efforts of President Barack Obama and his administration to restore the United States as a driving force of multilateral arms control and nonproliferation negotiations are commendable, yet the lack of progress on such issues over the last eight years has ensured that U.S. policy has not kept pace with changes in the geostrategic environment and the evolving security agenda. Meanwhile, an alternative agenda has been articulated by non-Western countries. This article focuses on the arms control perspectives of Non-Aligned Movement states and others that have begun to embrace the idea of "disarmament as humanitarian action." It explores this idea in the context of recent initiatives and argues that if the Obama administration wants to make progress on its arms control and nonproliferation priorities, it should consider a multifaceted approach that incorporates this emerging alternative agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
107373
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Each year, thousands of civilians around the world are slaughtered by weapons sold to unscrupulous regimes and transferred to criminals and illegal militias. The enormous human toll of this cycle of violence undermines economic development and political stability in fragile regions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
001056
|
|
|
Publication |
London, Greenhill Books, 1998.
|
Description |
144p.
|
Standard Number |
1853673234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
040553 | 355.825/HOG 040553 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
097066
|
|
|
Publication |
2010.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Violent clashes of June 2007 saw Hamas ousting Fatah from the Gaza Strip, thereby making patent the existence of a deep politico-military split within the Palestinian national movement. This article sheds light on the present face of the conflict in the Palestinian territories by adopting a historical-analytical perspective that emphasizes the role played by the availability of small arms and light weapons, as one of the many structural factors that underlie the transformation of the Palestinian struggle. Aware of the essentially contestable and reductionist nature of this endeavor, the authors examine the way in which the weapons acquisition process has changed in the time period from the beginning of the first Intifada in 1987 to the Gaza take-over by Hamas, 20 years later. In doing this, they extend the applicability of existing theories about the correspondence between access to weapons and the changing nature of insurgency, so to better understand a complex case where a national struggle has been spiralling into internecine violence and splintering, in what we may call "another Palestinian Nakba."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
020107
|
|
|
Publication |
2001.
|
Description |
5-14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
097677
|
|
|
Publication |
2009.
|
Summary/Abstract |
This article analyses the political evolution and legal structure of the Economic
Community of Western African States (ECOWAS) Convention on Small Arms and
Light Weapons, Their Ammunition and Other Related Material, adopted in 2006,
within the broader context of the small arms debate at the regional (initiatives by Mali)
and international levels, principally at the United Nations. The ECOWAS Convention
breaks new ground as it is based on human security, international humanitarian law,
sustainable development and human rights principles. The ECOWAS Convention is
groundbreaking in many respects. It is innovative especially vis-Ã -vis basing its text on
international humanitarian law, international human rights law and development needs.
In comparison with all other instruments of law on small arms, it is one of the most
evolved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
060720
|
|
|
11 |
ID:
103636
|
|
|
Publication |
2011.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Bangladesh in 2010 experienced a unique period in its domestic politics, and a boost in its bilateral and regional relationships. However, a fragile political system, poor human rights record, trade imbalances, and climate change vulnerabilities continued throughout the year and contributed to the everyday insecurities of the population.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
ID:
072629
|
|
|
Publication |
2006.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In recent years, researchers have increasingly turned their attention to the proliferation of small arms, a transnational trade amounting to over $7 billion in value during 2002. Small arms are difficult to track and are not the stuff of military parades, but they are immensely destructive. As much as $1 billion worth enters the black market annually. I argue that the illicit trade in small arms should be understood not as a market but as a network, one that shares some important properties with networked forms of organization studied by sociologists. I then employ quantitative methods developed for the study of social networks in an effort to show the basic structure of illegal small arms transfers to Africa. The analysis draws from my Illicit Arms Transfers dataset still in development, so the results make use of the most rudimentary information being collected. They are suggestive, however, and the analytical approach promises to shed considerable light on a corner of the global arms trade that is of great interest to the research and activist communities, and of great consequence to those in war-torn regions of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
ID:
050152
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Institute for Defence Studies and Analysis, 1997.
|
Description |
227p.Paperback
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
039148 | 551.467/SIN 039148 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
14 |
ID:
001683
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Knowledge world, 1999.
|
Description |
193p.
|
Standard Number |
8186019162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:2/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
041294 | 355.033058/STO 041294 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
041295 | 355.033058/STO 041295 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
15 |
ID:
083385
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
In 2001-2004 Bulgaria and Romania led internationally sponsored small arms and ammunition destruction. A few years later, they all but disappeared from destruction discussions. How to explain the enigma of these two countries' initial and large-scale action and their later hesitation? Both cases reveal the importance of external actors in small arms disarmament, in this case, especially the United States. It was Washington that created the initial demand for weapons destruction, as well as later export demands through war in Afghanistan and Iraq. While host authorities in Bulgaria and Romania may want to destroy at least part of their surplus stocks, they seem unwilling to make significant investments of their own. Convincing them to take ownership of the problem and solutions must be the next major objective of donor countries. The two countries are far from identical. Bulgaria has been more transparent, making informative reports on small arms policy to the United Nations and aiding foreign research into its small arms situation. It has shown somewhat greater interest in the disposal of surplus stocks, designating weapons for future destruction. Romania has been considerably more secretive; only limited information has been made available and the future of its weapons policies is much more obscure. But Romania has created a more reliable basis for future surplus destruction by reducing its armed forces more dramatically, especially its reserve rolls. Bulgaria seems more likely to resume destruction of surpluses, but Romania is likely to eliminate more when it gets around to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
ID:
083386
|
|
|
Publication |
2008.
|
Summary/Abstract |
Over 30 years of armed conflict, from the mid 1960s through the late 1990s, left large numbers of small arms and light weapons in Cambodia. Efforts to control small arms were initiated under the United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia, which administered the country in 1992-1993. However, arms continued to be distributed among the population until 1998, when fighting between the Royal Government of Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge finally ended. Concerned that proliferation of small arms was exacerbating crime, threatening prospects for investment and development, and drawing the country into regional terrorism and separatist movement, the government and foreign donors introduced a series of measures to control firearms ownership and stockpiles. The most visible part of these reforms was four major projects to reduce the numbers in circulation through destruction. Between 1999 and 2007, over 207,000 weapons were eliminated. The Cambodian experience shows that programmes to improve control of SALW and reduce their numbers can achieve significant results over a relatively short period of time. While international assistance - in terms of funding and resources - tends to be modest, it can have a considerable impact when supporting national authorities to implement their own policies. International assistance was made especially acceptable by building on existing aid relationships and stressing the greater legitimacy of multi-lateral support
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
ID:
008630
|
|
|
Publication |
May 1995.
|
Description |
143-161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
ID:
057526
|
|
|
19 |
ID:
018502
|
|
|
Publication |
Winter 2000.
|
Description |
285-297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
ID:
011497
|
|
|
Publication |
1996.
|
Description |
44-50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|