Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1206Hits:19534713Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MURPHY, STEPHEN A (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   147666


Case for proto-Dvāravatī: : a review of the art historical and archaeological evidence / Murphy, Stephen A   Journal Article
Murphy, Stephen A Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The mid-first millennium CE represents a crucial period in the emergence of early polities in Southeast Asia. However, disagreement remains between archaeologists and art historians as to the precise dating of this shift from prehistory to history. This article focuses on the Dvāravatī period and re-evaluates evidence in Thai and Western language publications. A growing number of sites excavated over the past two decades in particular show occupation from c. the fourth to fifth century onwards while others provide a continual sequence stretching back well into the Iron Age. I argue that evidence from these sites makes a strong case for postulating a proto-Dvāravatī period spanning c. the fourth to fifth centuries. In doing so this article proposes this period as the timeframe within which the nascent traits and characteristics of what becomes Dvāravatī in the seventh to ninth centuries are present and gradually developing.
        Export Export
2
ID:   147664


Transitions from late prehistory to early historic periods in mainland Southeast Asia, c. early to mid-first millennium CE / Murphy, Stephen A ; Stark, Miriam T   Journal Article
Stephen A. Murphy and Miriam T. Stark Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Studies of early Southeast Asia focus largely on its ‘classical states’, when rulers and their entourages from Sukhothai and Ayutthaya (Thailand), Angkor (Cambodia), Bagan (Myanmar), Champa and Dai Viet (Vietnam) clashed, conquered, and intermarried one another over an approximately six-century-long quest for legitimacy and political control. Scholarship on Southeast Asia has long held that such transformations were largely a response to outside intervention and external events, or at least that these occurred in interaction with a broader world system in which Southeast Asians played key roles. As research gathered pace on the prehistory of the region over the past five decades or so, it has become increasingly clear that indigenous Southeast Asian cultures grew in sophistication and complexity over the Iron Age in particular. This has led archaeologists to propose much greater agency in regard to the selective adaptation of incoming Indic beliefs and practices than was previously assumed under early scholarship of the nineteenth and early to mid-twentieth century.
        Export Export