| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
074492
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
092028
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
In 2001, at the first academic Trilateral Academic Conference in Moscow, trilateral cooperation among the three civilisation states and major powers of the Eurasian continent, was welcomed by all participants as an idea whose time had come.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
132382
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2014.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The economic rationale for energy collaboration between Turkey, Cyprus and Israel is compelling. Cyprus and Israel need commercially viable export routes for their gas while Turkey is eager to diversify and increase its gas supplies. Hydrocarbon resources could potentially be a catalyst for both bringing about a Cyprus settlement and a Turkey-Israel rapprochement. A trilateral cooperation scheme involving a Turkey-Israel pipeline and an LNG plant in Cyprus could offer strong commercial incentives to all parties. But it would require bold political vision on the part of the region's leaders, coupled with backing from influential external actors with an interest in reconciliation and stability in the Eastern Mediterranean.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4 |
ID:
123312
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Pushpa Kamal Dahal, alias Prachanda, made the trilateral proposal during his official visit to India in April 2013. This was the third time since 2010 that Prachanda had raised this issue. This concept seems to be a modified version of his earlier 'equidistance policy', which was declared after he became prime minister in September 2008. He proposed trilateral cooperation for the first time in October 2010 after visiting Beijing. He reiterated it after signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Asia Pacific Exchange and Cooperation Foundation (APECF) for development of Lumbini in November 2012 in Shanghai. He again proposed the same during his April 2013 visits to both Beijing and New Delhi. The fact of the matter is that he has reiterated this proposal each time he has returned from a visit to China. This time, in fact, he also discussed the issue directly with the Chinese president Xi Jinping. In response, Jinping first suggested working on bilateral projects: 'We [Nepal and China] can discuss later what projects can be implemented jointly by China, Nepal and India'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 5 |
ID:
123315
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Integrating the restive Tibetan minority with China has been the primary domestic challenge for Beijing. Thus far, its Nepal policy has been crafted essentially to address the Tibetan question. The idea of trilateral cooperation between India, Nepal and China apparently floated by Pushpa Kamal Dahal (Prachanda) in April 2013 was, in effect, first made by the former Chinese ambassador to Nepal, Yang Houlan, in 2012. Calling Kathmandu a trade gateway to New Delhi, he said: 'From an economic viewpoint, Nepal links China (with 1.3 billion people) with South Asia (with 1.5 billion people) the huge common market (that) provides great opportunities for both China and South Asia'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 6 |
ID:
123313
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Prachanda's proposal for trilateral cooperation between India, Nepal and China seems reasonable on the face of it. However, both China and Nepal should be aware that it will create a lot of misunderstandings in India. The reasons for this are as follows:
It is an insufficiently articulated proposal. No details are available. It has not been discussed with India formally. Does the trilateral cooperation confine itself to economic sectors, or does it also include cooperation in social sectors? Does it entail political cooperation too? These are some of the questions that create confusion regarding the objectives behind these proposals.
Does this proposal have the official backing of the UCPN Maoist party? Do other parties support it? Does the government of Nepal support it? Has a formal démarche been issued to the Government of India? The proposal seems to have been discussed in China. But with whom? Some Chinese officials and scholars have spoken about it. Has this been prompted on behalf of the Chinese? Have the Chinese officially taken up the proposal with the Indian side?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7 |
ID:
123314
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2013.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Trilateral cooperation between India, Nepal and China needs to be seen from the perspective of how beneficial it is for all three countries. However, such cooperation cannot be divorced from India's security concerns and its close relations with Nepal. Moreover, there are several issues that come into question, too. Are there any objectives behind this proposal? Does it involve only developmental cooperation? Does it undermine India's security interests?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
ID:
092027
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
Since the foreign ministers of China, India and Russia first met on the sidelines of the United Nations (UN) in September 2002, the question of mechanism-building of trilateral cooperation between the three countries has always been an issue on top of the agenda.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9 |
ID:
111848
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2012.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
We present highlights of the 11th Trilateral Conference of Scholars from Russia, India, and China, held in Beijing on November 15-16, 2011. The viability of the Russia-China-India format is emphasized, and new spheres and forms of increasing trilateral cooperation are listed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
ID:
147750
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
New Delhi, Academic Foundation, 2010.
|
| Description |
123p.hbk
|
| Standard Number |
9788171887828
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 058813 | 327.4705/KUN 058813 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 11 |
ID:
077707
|
|
|
| 12 |
ID:
055188
|
|
|
| 13 |
ID:
095409
|
|
|
| 14 |
ID:
087227
|
|
|
|
|
| Edition |
Vol II
|
| Publication |
Paris, OECD, 1978.
|
| Description |
241p.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
| Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
| 019100 | 337/DEV 019100 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
| 15 |
ID:
092030
|
|
|
|
|
| Publication |
2008.
|
| Summary/Abstract |
The relationship between China, Russia and India is one of the most important international relations in the current international Community. It has been taking on a new look in the recent years. In retrospect to the past seven years, we can see that scholars of the three countries have taken th opportunity of the seminar as a platform to meet with each other, exchange their ideas and to promote the development of each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|