Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
148114
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The disintegration of USSR was an important incident in international politics; it changed the structure of international relations in the 1990s. This dramatic event also changed the scenario of the international politics at the global level. It was this event that ended the system of Cold War military blocs and the bipolar world order in international relations, which had created rivalry and competition between the two blocs. After that, the former USSR’s allies, especially the Third World countries, reoriented their policies to suit the Western model of globalization led by the US.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
148582
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The basic recommendations for India to carry out a Pro-active Approach in its policy is to increase investments, encourage regular talks between the leaders of India and the Central Asian Republics, pushing projects for trade, transport links, educational and cultural exchanges apart from trying to solve tensed relations between India and her neighbours who share borders with the Central Asian Republics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
181486
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
176159
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India and Bangladesh continue to be related to disputes along the common border. The purpose of the paper is to explore those narratives which are local and based to the opposite of securitization process. The process of securitization is the dominant paradigm of security which affects the life of people who is somehow related with cross border activity for the variety of reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
175384
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
A ‘Green Partnership’ focusing on energy security, climate change and food security has just been announced by President Barak Obama and Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. This partnership is an important step toward deepening cooperation between the US and India to unleash clean-tech innovation and combat climate change. This announcement comes at a crucial time when the world, particularly in the lead-up to Copenhagen, needs leadership, cooperation and action.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
151136
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
In sum we can say that the majority of the nations are not really interested in being a part of the SOP as it is having a negative impact among the nations. But they really wanted to maintain good relations with China and India. The relations they are still continuing with China are purely business oriented. They are not only seeking assistance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
150610
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The historic event of 9/11 reminded Brendan Simms, a Professor at Cambridge University, of the words of poet William Butler Yeats: ‘All changed, changed utterly - a terrible beauty is born’. What has changed after 9/11? And which terrible beauty was born in the wake of it? The 9/11 attacks questioned the ‘secular modernity’ underlying contemporary world politics, instilled a demonic image of Islamic civilization, and provided a launching pad to US-led war on terror [Islamic terror?] in Afghanistan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
ID:
181501
|
|
|
9 |
ID:
186259
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The existing setting of the Central Asian region suggests that the region is passing through a transitional phase.
New states have yet to complete the task of nation building and evolve a policy, which strikes a balance between pluralism and national unity. The rich oil and natural gas resources of this region are attracting the foreign states and multinational companies to invest in the energ y sector and undertake construction of new pipelines needed to promote export to the international markets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
ID:
152159
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
The end of the Cold War saw a change in the structure of the international system from a bipolar world with the United States bloc on one side and the Soviet bloc on the other to a unipolar world with the United States as the sole superpower. Hardly any international relations theorists had predicted such a sudden end to the Cold War. Realists such as Kenneth Waltz (Jackson & Sørensen, 2007) continued to argue that from their theoretical standpoint of structural realism, a bipolar world was more desirable than a unipolar or a multipolar world in an anarchical international system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|