Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:554
Hits:19920563
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
ADMISSIBILITY
(4)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
159405
Admissibility of Outer Continental Shelf Delimitation Claims Before the ICJ Absent a Recommendation by the CLCS
/ Vega-Barbosa, Giovanny
Vega-Barbosa, Giovanny
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
In the 2017 Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean Case, the International Court of Justice stated that “in appropriate circumstances” maritime delimitation claims beyond 200 nm may be admitted before the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf issues a recommendation. This is a deviation from the Court's previous approach in the 2016 Nicaragua v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections) Case. This article follows the evolution of the international case law with respect to the admissibility of outer continental shelf delimitation claims absent a final and binding outer limit, and highlights the positive implications of the International Court's most recent formula.
Key Words
Continental Shelf
;
Admissibility
;
Maritime Delimitation Beyond 200 Nm
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
156862
Difining disputes and characterizing claims subject-matter jurisdiction in law of the sea convention litigation
/ Harrison, James
Harrison, James
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Key Words
Jurisdiction
;
Dispute
;
Settlement
;
Admissibility
;
Compromissory Clause
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
3
ID:
148524
outh China Sea arbitration: observations on the award on jurisdiction and admissibility
/ Talmon, Stefan
Talmon, Stefan
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
In the South China Sea Arbitration between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on 29 October 2015 issued its Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. The Tribunal rejected China’s objection that the disputes presented by the Philippines concerned, in essence, the extent of China’s territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea and were thus outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. The Tribunal found, inter alia, that the Philippines’ submissions reflected disputes between the parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention, that there was no other State indispensable to the proceedings, and that the Philippines had met the requirement under Article 283 of the Convention that the parties exchange views regarding the settlement of their disputes. This paper examines the Tribunal’s findings with regard to each and every of the Philippines’ 15 final submissions and demonstrates that some of its findings on the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Philippines’ claims are seriously flawed and based on procedural irregularities.
Key Words
Jurisdiction
;
South China Sea Arbitration
;
Admissibility
;
Observations
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export
4
ID:
148523
South China Sea arbitration (the Philippines v. China): assessment of the award on jurisdiction and admissibility
/ Pemmaraju, Sreenivasa Rao
Pemmaraju, Sreenivasa Rao
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
China claims “historic rights” over the islands and other maritime features in the South China Sea. The Philippines contests these claims on the ground that they are incompatible with the 1982 Convention on the Law of the Sea. It initiated arbitration under Annex VII of the (UNCLOS) for a declaratory judgment to that effect. China rejected the arbitral procedure in part because of its 2006 Declaration which excludes all such disputes from the compulsory dispute settlement procedure of the Convention. This paper examines the recent award of the Arbitral Tribunal accepting jurisdiction over the some of the submissions made by the Philippines. It finds that the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea has very little to offer to decide on issues of sovereignty and associated issues of overlapping maritime entitlements.
Key Words
Jurisdiction
;
Philippines V. China
;
South China Sea Arbitration
;
Admissibility
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export