Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:1073
Hits:24597858
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
OBSERVATIONS
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
151838
Observations, diplomacy, and the future of ocean governance
/ Fritz, Jan-Stefan
Fritz, Jan-Stefan
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
The current G7 proposal for a global ocean observing initiative is a valuable test case for the role of science in shaping diplomatic relations in the management of international spaces beyond national jurisdiction.
Key Words
Diplomacy
;
Ocean Governance
;
Observations
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
148524
outh China Sea arbitration: observations on the award on jurisdiction and admissibility
/ Talmon, Stefan
Talmon, Stefan
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
In the South China Sea Arbitration between the Republic of the Philippines and the People’s Republic of China the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on 29 October 2015 issued its Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility. The Tribunal rejected China’s objection that the disputes presented by the Philippines concerned, in essence, the extent of China’s territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea and were thus outside the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. The Tribunal found, inter alia, that the Philippines’ submissions reflected disputes between the parties concerning the interpretation or application of the Convention, that there was no other State indispensable to the proceedings, and that the Philippines had met the requirement under Article 283 of the Convention that the parties exchange views regarding the settlement of their disputes. This paper examines the Tribunal’s findings with regard to each and every of the Philippines’ 15 final submissions and demonstrates that some of its findings on the Tribunal’s jurisdiction and the admissibility of the Philippines’ claims are seriously flawed and based on procedural irregularities.
Key Words
Jurisdiction
;
South China Sea Arbitration
;
Admissibility
;
Observations
Links
'Full Text'
In Basket
Export