Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:467Hits:20410569Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
PRECAUTIONARY SAVING (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   159074


Has the compulsory school merger program reduced the welfare of rural residents in China? / Cai, Weixian   Journal Article
Cai, Weixian Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The compulsory school merger program in rural regions of China imposed higher education costs on rural residents, decreased their consumption and reduced their welfare. In this study, we employ household-level data and the difference-in-differences method to analyze the policy effect on residents' consumption and education costs. Our results show that the compulsory school merger program had a negative effect on the consumption of rural residents and inflicted multiple education costs on them. We also find that the increase in the distance between school and home is an important explanation for the effect of this policy on rural residents' education costs.
        Export Export
2
ID:   149946


Saving Alberta's resource revenues: role of intergenerational and liquidity funds / Bremer, Ton S. van den; Ploeg, Frederick van der   Journal Article
Bremer, Ton S. van den Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract We use a welfare-based intertemporal stochastic optimization model and historical data to estimate the size of the optimal intergenerational and liquidity funds and the corresponding resource dividend available to the government of the Canadian province Alberta. To first-order of approximation, this dividend should be a constant fraction of total above- and below-ground wealth, complemented by additional precautionary savings at initial times to build up a small liquidity fund to cope with oil price volatility. The ongoing dividend equals approximately 30 per cent of government revenue and requires building assets of approximately 40 per cent of GDP in 2030, 100 per cent of GDP in 2050 and 165 per cent in 2100. Finally, the effect of the recent plunge in oil prices on our estimates is examined. Our recommendations are in stark contrast with historical and current government policy.
        Export Export