Query Result Set
SLIM21 Home
Advanced Search
My Info
Browse
Arrivals
Expected
Reference Items
Journal List
Proposals
Media List
Rules
ActiveUsers:338
Hits:19936417
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
Help
Topics
Tutorial
Advanced search
Hide Options
Sort Order
Natural
Author / Creator, Title
Title
Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Title
Subject, Item Type, Author / Creator, Title
Item Type, Subject, Author / Creator, Title
Publication Date, Title
Items / Page
5
10
15
20
Modern View
RESOURCE WEALTH
(2)
answer(s).
Srl
Item
1
ID:
150009
Resource revenue management and wealth neutrality in Norway
/ Mohn, Klaus
Mohn, Klaus
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
An important idea behind the Norwegian oil fund mechanism and the fiscal spending rule is to protect the non-oil economy from the adverse effects of excessive spending of resource revenues over the Government budget. A critical assumption in this respect is that public sector saving is not being offset by private sector dis-saving, which is at stake with the hypothesis of Ricardian equivalence. Based on a framework of co-integrating saving rates, this model provides an empirical test of the Ricardian equivalence hypothesis on Norwegian time series data. Although the model rejects the strong-form presence of Ricardian equivalence, results indicate that the Norwegian approach does not fully succeed in separating spending of resource revenues from the accrual of the same revenues.
Key Words
Fiscal Policy
;
Saving
;
Oil Revenues
;
Resource Wealth
In Basket
Export
2
ID:
149946
Saving Alberta's resource revenues: role of intergenerational and liquidity funds
/ Bremer, Ton S. van den; Ploeg, Frederick van der
Bremer, Ton S. van den
Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract
We use a welfare-based intertemporal stochastic optimization model and historical data to estimate the size of the optimal intergenerational and liquidity funds and the corresponding resource dividend available to the government of the Canadian province Alberta. To first-order of approximation, this dividend should be a constant fraction of total above- and below-ground wealth, complemented by additional precautionary savings at initial times to build up a small liquidity fund to cope with oil price volatility. The ongoing dividend equals approximately 30 per cent of government revenue and requires building assets of approximately 40 per cent of GDP in 2030, 100 per cent of GDP in 2050 and 165 per cent in 2100. Finally, the effect of the recent plunge in oil prices on our estimates is examined. Our recommendations are in stark contrast with historical and current government policy.
Key Words
Fiscal Policy
;
Oil Price Volatility
;
Precautionary Saving
;
Resource Wealth
In Basket
Export