Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:397Hits:19962031Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
JUDGE, ANDREW (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   150529


Challenging reductionism in analyses of EU-Russia energy relations / Sharples, Jack D; Judge, Andrew; Maltby, Tomos   Journal Article
Sharples, Jack D Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The EU and Russia exist in a complex and, at times, seemingly paradoxical and contradictory relationship. On the one hand, the two sides remain rhetorically committed towards a close and developing strategic partnership. On the other, the EU-Russia political relationship is currently at its lowest ebb since the end of the Cold War due to the crisis in Ukraine. A mixture of politics, economics and geography provide an impetus for the development of mutually beneficial relations and, at the same time, obstacles to the achievement of such a positive partnership.
        Export Export
2
ID:   153503


European energy union? caught between securitisation and ‘riskification’ / Maltby, Tomas; Judge, Andrew   Journal Article
Judge, Andrew Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Fears about the security of supplies have been central to debates about the development of an integrated EU energy policy over the past decade, leading to claims that energy has been ‘securitised’. Previous analyses have found, however, that although shared security concerns are frequently used as justification for further integration, they can also serve as a rationale for Member States to resist sharing sovereignty. Transcending this apparent paradox would require not just agreement about whether energy supplies are security concerns, but also agreement about what kind of security concern they are. In this article, we examine whether such an agreement could emerge through a comparative analysis of constructions of gas security in the UK and Poland. Utilising a framework that draws from both the philosophical and sociological wings of Securitisation Studies, we demonstrate that although gas has been elevated on the security agendas of both states, the specific logic of insecurity – securitisation or riskification – underpinning these constructions differs substantially, and is conditioned by distinct modes of governance in each Member State. This, we contend, limits the potential for further integration of EU energy policies in the context of the European Commission’s proposals for an ‘Energy Union’.
        Export Export