|
Sort Order |
|
|
|
Items / Page
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Srl | Item |
1 |
ID:
155014
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, New Century Publications, 2017.
|
Description |
xxiv, 210p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9788177084412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059180 | 330.54/SAH 059180 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
2 |
ID:
181961
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
On 9 November 2016, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced his ‘demonetization’ policy which rendered all Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 notes null and void. His government claimed that this policy, among other things, would curb stone-pelting in India’s restive Jammu and Kashmir by rendering valueless the copious illegal currency that, according to India, Pakistan pumped into the state to pay protestors to throw stones. Subsequently, New Delhi claimed success despite countervailing evidence for this claim. Here, we assemble a novel dataset to evaluate these assertions. After controlling for other factors that may explain variation in stone-pelting, we find that demonetization corresponded to increased stone-pelting. This finding is important for at least two reasons. First, Indian efforts to depict all protests in Jammu and Kashmir as the result of Pakistani payments both delegitimize Kashmiris’ grievances by reducing them to anti-state behaviors and diminish public appetite for addressing those grievances. Second, the current populist Indian government, which caters to Hindu nationalists, selectively curates facts to justify its actions, big and small, to the detriment of democratic accountability and governance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
ID:
150794
|
|
|
Publication |
New Delhi, Ministry of Finance, 2017.
|
Description |
xiv, 319p.pbk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
058935 | 338.954/IND 058935 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
4 |
ID:
155206
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
India undertook a monetary experiment of gigantic scale on November 8, 2016, that resulted in the withdrawal of the legal-tender character of Rs. 500 and Rs. 1000 currency. We make a preliminary attempt to analyze existing data to understand the various dimensions of the great monetary gamble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
ID:
187091
|
|
|
Publication |
Gurgaon, Penguin Random House India Pvt Ltd,
|
Description |
xliv, 234p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9780670089208
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
060227 | 320.54/MAH 060227 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
6 |
ID:
170079
|
|
|
Publication |
Noida, HarperCollins Publishers, 2020.
|
Description |
xiii, 293p.hbk
|
Standard Number |
9789353575946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copies: C:1/I:0,R:0,Q:0
Circulation
Accession# | Call# | Current Location | Status | Policy | Location |
059812 | 320.54/SIN 059812 | Main | On Shelf | General | |
|
|
|
|
7 |
ID:
165949
|
|
|
Summary/Abstract |
An assessment of Modi’s economic policies (“Modinomics”) shows that the gap between intentions and outcomes remains wide because Modinomics has been too cautious and contradictory to overcome the unusual structural challenges facing India’s economy. Moreover, the contradictions of Modinomics, which privileges trade protectionism and selective financial-sector liberalization, limits the potential gains from deeper global economic integration. This article argues that deepening economic reforms, including integration into the global economy, can help mitigate the structural impediments facing the Indian economy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|