Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1438Hits:19140140Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
MUTUAL ACCOUNTABILITY (2) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   152743


Forging soft accountability in unlikely settings: a conceptual analysis of mutual accountability in the context of South-South cooperation / Kim, Taekyoon ; Lim, Sojin   Journal Article
Kim, Taekyoon Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract This study sets out to introduce the concept of soft accountability as a new approach to understanding mutual accountability in unlikely settings of development cooperation through South-South cooperation. In doing so, this study analyzes three defining components of accountability (responsibility, answerability, and enforceability) and identifies the actors and modalities of mutual accountability in four different situations of South-South cooperation mechanisms. The main finding in this conceptual analysis contains establishing an institutional and sustainable development platform for the mutual accountability of South-South cooperation by not only reflecting the distinctive nature of South-South cooperation, but also focusing on responsibility first to reduce buck-passing among actors and to sustain its continuous management.
        Export Export
2
ID:   190215


Mutual Accountability in Fragile States: Seeking Strategic Responses through Partnership Platforms / Kim, Bo Kyung   Journal Article
Kim, Bo Kyung Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract The study reported in this article aimed to find the extent to which the mutual accountability mechanism is applicable in fragile states where state capacity and legitimacy are insufficient. Donors provide foreign aid to fragile states even when there is no firm-standing counterpart to be held accountable. This is done to meet short-term development needs that are heavily focused on humanitarian relief. Based on an examination of the discursive evolution of fragility and donors’ categorization of fragile states based on the capacity-legitimacy configuration, this found that development needs in fragile states can be met through mutual accountability relations with partnership platforms. Represented by the g7+, partnership platforms channel the development needs in a collective form and enable their Member States to gain a certain level of legitimacy. Individual approaches to these countries may be challenging, but seeking strategic responses to development needs through such partnership platforms can create new opportunities for development effectiveness.
        Export Export