| Srl | Item |
| 1 |
ID:
169660
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
I investigate how the level of inequality affects American public opinion on foreign aid. As the level of inequality increases across the United States, the majority of the public will be more likely to demand the government implement policies that should ameliorate severe inequality in society. Assuming that government resources are limited, a greater level of inequality in American society may weaken public support for foreign aid because the public may prioritize providing social safety nets and welfare programs in domestic milieu over granting foreign aid to developing countries. In addition, as inequality widens, the public may perceive economic globalization as one of the main causes of inequality; thus, their overall support for globalization will decline. As a result, American support for global engagement will be negatively affected, and public support for foreign aid may decrease. An empirical test using public opinion data in 50 U.S. states since the 1980s confirms my theory: widening inequality both across states and within a given state does weaken public support for U.S. foreign aid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
ID:
152889
|
|
|
|
|
| Summary/Abstract |
This study investigates how interindustry goods market networks influence industry lobbying as foreign firms' direct investment and local production increase in the United States. The goods market networks consist of each sector's procurement of inputs from other sectors and the sectoral destinations of its outputs. I found that domestic upstream sectors modify their lobbying in ways dissimilar to those of downstream sectors when foreign firms' local production and sales increase. Upstream sectors lobby more when US affiliates of foreign firms that procure inputs from their own supply chains gain market share at the expense of domestic firms in investment-receiving sectors. In contrast, downstream sectors lobby less when they save input procurement costs as domestic and foreign firms compete to produce quality goods at a lower price. The empirical results imply that goods market networks provide another theoretical framework, in addition to that provided by factor or sector models, in the analysis of demand side of trade policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 3 |
ID:
162041
|
|
|