Query Result Set
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:759Hits:20300614Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

  Hide Options
Sort Order Items / Page
GENDER BIAS (3) answer(s).
 
SrlItem
1
ID:   153811


Gender bias in international relations graduate education? new evidence from syllabi / Colgan, Jeff   Journal Article
Colgan, Jeff Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Gender diversity is good for the study of international relations (IR) and political science. Graduate training is an opportunity for scholars to affect the demographics of their field and the gendered practices within it. This article presents a first-cut investigation of the degree to which gender bias exists in graduate IR syllabi. The author found that the gender of the instructor for graduate courses matters significantly for what type of research is taught, in two ways. First, on average, female instructors assign significantly more research by female authors than male instructors. Second, women appear to be considerably more reluctant than men about assigning their own research as required readings. Some but not all of the difference between male- and female-taught courses might be explained by differences in course composition.
        Export Export
2
ID:   172703


Gender bias in legislative studies? / Powell, Lynda   Journal Article
Powell, Lynda Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Key Words Legislative Studies  Gender Bias 
        Export Export
3
ID:   160331


Gender Bias in Student Evaluations / Mitchell, Kristina M W   Journal Article
Mitchell, Kristina M W Journal Article
0 Rating(s) & 0 Review(s)
Summary/Abstract Many universities use student evaluations of teachers (SETs) as part of consideration for tenure, compensation, and other employment decisions. However, in doing so, they may be engaging in discriminatory practices against female academics. This study further explores the relationship between gender and SETs described by MacNell, Driscoll, and Hunt (2015) by using both content analysis in student-evaluation comments and quantitative analysis of students’ ordinal scoring of their instructors. The authors show that the language students use in evaluations regarding male professors is significantly different than language used in evaluating female professors. They also show that a male instructor administering an identical online course as a female instructor receives higher ordinal scores in teaching evaluations, even when questions are not instructor-specific. Findings suggest that the relationship between gender and teaching evaluations may indicate that the use of evaluations in employment decisions is discriminatory against women.
Key Words Gender Bias  Student Evaluations 
        Export Export